Yes. Sue Grey is an extraordinarily talented, intelligent, hard working and caring woman. A relentless freedom fighter. All New Zealanders are totally indebted to her. Some of us don’t even realise how crucial she is to the future of NZ & our personal rights & freedoms. Some of us do, and are eternally grateful for her ongoing dedication and courageous efforts. Imagine if we had someone as smart & honest & caring running the show here. 🙏
In an another comment on this thread I wrote some not-so-nice things about the NZ legal system and judiciary. It was a spontaneous reaction -- I am sickened when I hear how blatant and widespread is the level of their corruption, and I believe this laid-back approach to law is a direct outgrowth of the colonial system. Whereas there have been legal/judicial reforms in the home countries, the former colonies lag behind in this respect. But that's not to say that back home the common law systems are ethical stalwarts -- not by a long shot, although their transgressions are not as blatant, I would say. Fact: Where there is power and opportunity, corruption will take place.
And so, I have to eat my words as I bring up the name of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who as we speak, is being investigated by the press for accepting favours from conservative "close and dear friends," favours that total in the millions of dollars. Thomas insists there exists no conflict of interest when he acceptis ultra-luxurious perks and vacations from conservative friends. To throw us off the scent, in a video of his life on the court, he professed that his favourite form of vacation is simply to drive his camper to the woods or to the beach, where along with the average people who hang out there he can rough it up as he communes with nature. However, the very opposite has proven to be true. Courtesy of his wealthy friends, Thomas has gone to exclusive spas, gotten massages, cruized in private yachts, and together with his wife has racked up millions in costs, all paid by his dear, well-heeled friends. What happened to that camper?
The latest news is that there has indeed been collusion and that some of the gifts he accepted came from an individual whose case, concerning the challenge of voting rights in the American South, was subsequently heard before the Supreme Court. Thomas' vote favoured his friend.
When the media wants to investigate in earnest, it does a good job. Unfortunately, this very same media has partaken of the Covid Cool-Aid and is not interested in investigating the murderous aftermath of the covid jabs.
Why are they now going after Thomas? Well, he was instrumental in overturning the abortion case Roe v Wade and he has made statements that the right to free speech, sacred to most Americans, must be regulated. The liberals want him out, therefore they enlist the press to go into action.
We say that the right to refuse the jab is a personal freedom; aren't we after all in control of our own bodies? Roe v Wade defended the need for individual privacy during the decision-making process that affected control of our bodies as women (for those of us who are women). Roe v Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court and the right it defended is no longer guaranteed by the federal government. The right to privacy is no small thing. Let's agree that initial encroachments in civil and personal liberties lead to large, more dangerous encroachments. So where are we headed?
Freedom of speech is an inalienable right, but historically, all rights, no matter their vital importance, have been suppressed, suppressed and suspended, even in the United States with its remarkable Bill of Rights (the first ten amemdments of its constitution). It is with hard-won battles that these rights were reinstituted. There is indeed fear that the legal/judicial pendulum will swing to the right once more and place conditions on the First Amendment. There is no room here in my comment to enumerate details, but our inalienable rights and freedoms were in chains before they were set free piece by piece mostly by the Waren Court (Chief Justice Earl Warren), and there are individuals, Clarence Thomas amongst them, who would like to see a return to restrictions.
Attacking the right to inalienable rights, attacking women's right to control their own bodies, having no real respect for women as evidenced by the Anita Hill hearings during Thomas' confirmation process for his seat in the Supreme Court (the guys voted him in, what a surprise), having accepted luxurious gifts and financial favours from super-wealthy friends, all that and possibly more that we are not aware of, make Clarence Thomas corrupt as corrupt can be.
No matter the country, there is no end to corruption.
And what about us? As average blokes, we are at the mercy of the wealthy and powerful unless we join hands, speak up, protest, continue to bring legal action, and refuse to be controlled. In numbers there is power; the joint actions of the average blokes pave the road to liberty.
How does all this prertain to Sue Grey? Ms Grey is someone who lifts her fist to power and tries to ensure the road to liberty is free of debris, that's how!
It sounds as though New Zealand had and continues to have a stagnant and archaic legal system as compared to other systems of common law (the US and UK come to mind). It's interesting that several of those on the NZ front lines who are attempting to correct the ailing systems of government are attorneys and physicians who are not native New Zealanders and bring a keener perspective to the meaning of personal freedom and ethical conduct, especially conduct that prevents cronyism, the latter being rather rampant in NZ regulatory agencies, where equestrian sport and association with pharmaceutical companies apparently are given precedence over the economic and physical welfare of the country's people. Sue Grey has blazed an incredible trail in trying to correct these wrongs. She appears to be intelligent, knowledgeable, methodical, dedicated, and fearless. Thanks for featuring these speakers. We get to understand who they truly are, and they are wonderful human beings.
The question at the end is very important. What exactly or where is this all headed? Perhaps, I can provide some context and answer to that.
It's majorly a spiritual problem first.
We're dealing with dark spiritual forces who are inhabiting or influencing humans geared towards the ultimate destruction of humanity and a lot has been foreshadowed by the scriptures - See Revelation n Daniel.
This in my view is also majorly responsible for the docility, apathy, deception or perhaps delusion amongst average people who just want to " go along to get along". I mean am still dumbfounded by the complicity of humanity in all this charade, that I sometimes wonder am I the one who is crazy or what.
However, with that being said, I don't think heaven meant for us to just play dead, No Way. The biggest question is how do we get enough people to WAKE UP FOR GOODNESS SAKE...
It appears to me, that with the increasing and growing issues around sudden deaths and the apparent unwillingness and perhaps pride amongst those who took the jabs is creating a wedge or gulf between those in the freedom movement and the rest of the populace.
All we need is how to mobilise that needed critical mass to overturn things. I mean why can't we sack everyone in parliament for example. Those goons had the nerve to not subject themselves to the same restrictions the rest of the populace was subjected to. How can that be right for goodness sake. These people are JUST PLAIN EVIL. The people only need to realise they have the power.
WE CAN DO THIS, but it must start first on our knees in prayer to God and then on our feet persuading the hearts and minds of friends n families to rise up to the greatest challenge of our time. There seems to be a thick cloak of delusion and evil hanging over the minds of humanity.
Yes. Sue Grey is an extraordinarily talented, intelligent, hard working and caring woman. A relentless freedom fighter. All New Zealanders are totally indebted to her. Some of us don’t even realise how crucial she is to the future of NZ & our personal rights & freedoms. Some of us do, and are eternally grateful for her ongoing dedication and courageous efforts. Imagine if we had someone as smart & honest & caring running the show here. 🙏
In an another comment on this thread I wrote some not-so-nice things about the NZ legal system and judiciary. It was a spontaneous reaction -- I am sickened when I hear how blatant and widespread is the level of their corruption, and I believe this laid-back approach to law is a direct outgrowth of the colonial system. Whereas there have been legal/judicial reforms in the home countries, the former colonies lag behind in this respect. But that's not to say that back home the common law systems are ethical stalwarts -- not by a long shot, although their transgressions are not as blatant, I would say. Fact: Where there is power and opportunity, corruption will take place.
And so, I have to eat my words as I bring up the name of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, who as we speak, is being investigated by the press for accepting favours from conservative "close and dear friends," favours that total in the millions of dollars. Thomas insists there exists no conflict of interest when he acceptis ultra-luxurious perks and vacations from conservative friends. To throw us off the scent, in a video of his life on the court, he professed that his favourite form of vacation is simply to drive his camper to the woods or to the beach, where along with the average people who hang out there he can rough it up as he communes with nature. However, the very opposite has proven to be true. Courtesy of his wealthy friends, Thomas has gone to exclusive spas, gotten massages, cruized in private yachts, and together with his wife has racked up millions in costs, all paid by his dear, well-heeled friends. What happened to that camper?
The latest news is that there has indeed been collusion and that some of the gifts he accepted came from an individual whose case, concerning the challenge of voting rights in the American South, was subsequently heard before the Supreme Court. Thomas' vote favoured his friend.
When the media wants to investigate in earnest, it does a good job. Unfortunately, this very same media has partaken of the Covid Cool-Aid and is not interested in investigating the murderous aftermath of the covid jabs.
Why are they now going after Thomas? Well, he was instrumental in overturning the abortion case Roe v Wade and he has made statements that the right to free speech, sacred to most Americans, must be regulated. The liberals want him out, therefore they enlist the press to go into action.
We say that the right to refuse the jab is a personal freedom; aren't we after all in control of our own bodies? Roe v Wade defended the need for individual privacy during the decision-making process that affected control of our bodies as women (for those of us who are women). Roe v Wade was overturned by the Supreme Court and the right it defended is no longer guaranteed by the federal government. The right to privacy is no small thing. Let's agree that initial encroachments in civil and personal liberties lead to large, more dangerous encroachments. So where are we headed?
Freedom of speech is an inalienable right, but historically, all rights, no matter their vital importance, have been suppressed, suppressed and suspended, even in the United States with its remarkable Bill of Rights (the first ten amemdments of its constitution). It is with hard-won battles that these rights were reinstituted. There is indeed fear that the legal/judicial pendulum will swing to the right once more and place conditions on the First Amendment. There is no room here in my comment to enumerate details, but our inalienable rights and freedoms were in chains before they were set free piece by piece mostly by the Waren Court (Chief Justice Earl Warren), and there are individuals, Clarence Thomas amongst them, who would like to see a return to restrictions.
Attacking the right to inalienable rights, attacking women's right to control their own bodies, having no real respect for women as evidenced by the Anita Hill hearings during Thomas' confirmation process for his seat in the Supreme Court (the guys voted him in, what a surprise), having accepted luxurious gifts and financial favours from super-wealthy friends, all that and possibly more that we are not aware of, make Clarence Thomas corrupt as corrupt can be.
No matter the country, there is no end to corruption.
And what about us? As average blokes, we are at the mercy of the wealthy and powerful unless we join hands, speak up, protest, continue to bring legal action, and refuse to be controlled. In numbers there is power; the joint actions of the average blokes pave the road to liberty.
How does all this prertain to Sue Grey? Ms Grey is someone who lifts her fist to power and tries to ensure the road to liberty is free of debris, that's how!
It sounds as though New Zealand had and continues to have a stagnant and archaic legal system as compared to other systems of common law (the US and UK come to mind). It's interesting that several of those on the NZ front lines who are attempting to correct the ailing systems of government are attorneys and physicians who are not native New Zealanders and bring a keener perspective to the meaning of personal freedom and ethical conduct, especially conduct that prevents cronyism, the latter being rather rampant in NZ regulatory agencies, where equestrian sport and association with pharmaceutical companies apparently are given precedence over the economic and physical welfare of the country's people. Sue Grey has blazed an incredible trail in trying to correct these wrongs. She appears to be intelligent, knowledgeable, methodical, dedicated, and fearless. Thanks for featuring these speakers. We get to understand who they truly are, and they are wonderful human beings.
What a great interview.
The question at the end is very important. What exactly or where is this all headed? Perhaps, I can provide some context and answer to that.
It's majorly a spiritual problem first.
We're dealing with dark spiritual forces who are inhabiting or influencing humans geared towards the ultimate destruction of humanity and a lot has been foreshadowed by the scriptures - See Revelation n Daniel.
This in my view is also majorly responsible for the docility, apathy, deception or perhaps delusion amongst average people who just want to " go along to get along". I mean am still dumbfounded by the complicity of humanity in all this charade, that I sometimes wonder am I the one who is crazy or what.
However, with that being said, I don't think heaven meant for us to just play dead, No Way. The biggest question is how do we get enough people to WAKE UP FOR GOODNESS SAKE...
It appears to me, that with the increasing and growing issues around sudden deaths and the apparent unwillingness and perhaps pride amongst those who took the jabs is creating a wedge or gulf between those in the freedom movement and the rest of the populace.
All we need is how to mobilise that needed critical mass to overturn things. I mean why can't we sack everyone in parliament for example. Those goons had the nerve to not subject themselves to the same restrictions the rest of the populace was subjected to. How can that be right for goodness sake. These people are JUST PLAIN EVIL. The people only need to realise they have the power.
WE CAN DO THIS, but it must start first on our knees in prayer to God and then on our feet persuading the hearts and minds of friends n families to rise up to the greatest challenge of our time. There seems to be a thick cloak of delusion and evil hanging over the minds of humanity.
God bless.