Thank you gentlemen for sharing your insightful discourse.
A thought that entertained me was the stark dichotomy of Western materialist thinking from its tribal African roots. It reveals to me how successful the Luciferian inversion program has been. For instance, the belief of the majority that potentially injuring or sacrificing children with an experimental new technology in the hope that it will save the elderly. When the tribal view is the old will wander onto an ice flow or into the bush to make way for the young. That the flu was an old mans' best friend, to enable the feeble to expire gracefully and in dignity and not linger on for years in a vegetative state exhausting precious health resources. How ironic then that the majority in NZ voted for euthenasia reform, but covid led to a situation where youths suffered and died in an attempt to save the frail all because of the cognitive dissonance brought about by carefully machinated propaganda programming.
The ultimate inversion is that the universe is not evolving, and man is not evolving in it, entropic devolution means we are in decent as a species. But this video confirms that some men personally choose and aspire to fight the prevailing atmosphere of dissonance and depreciation as human beings.
The aristocratic families that have ruled man since before Christ are still ruling. The sock puppets like Rutte, Biden and Ardern et.al. are modelled off the Caesars' who answered to the Venetian nobility, as the Black Pope does today. Rome was never conquered, it just hid, manifestations occurred in Hitler's attempted reestablishment of the Holy (sic) Roman Empire, and more recently the Forth Reich or Schwab's forth industrial revolution. I believe these shadow rulers of the world are very fearful that their power and influence are threatened and they need to act fast and by establishing a global Feudalistic Fascism maintain their dominance.
It is a war, a battle between the centuries old inbred aristocratic families of Europe, and the common man, who despite what the inbreeds believe are far smarter and wiser than they are. The former having to rely on academics from the common classes, it is these who must be shamed and hindered.
I'm sorry I've gone on too much. I only wanted to thank you for sharing....I now find it hard to delete the waffle.
Anyway be assured that we love you all in the resistance, it is the same evil that was at work in the 20th century, we can conquer it.
Congratulations, Emanuel, on your inaugural interview format!!!
This is relaxed yet deeply philosophical and much appreciated conversation between two exceptional individuals who are dedicated to the cause of human liberty. It's unfortunate that they have been persecuted for expressing objections to the science of the covid jab. That's what totalitarian states do: they go after the best and the brightest because it is such individuals who insist that human beings are treated ethically. How does one counter the evil inherent in a totalitarian system? Well, the answer is right here in this video: act with goodness; do as much good as you possibly can.
Thank you for the interview with Dr. Monchy. I'm writing this note because, even though I do not hold to the same beliefs, if I had put in all the work it takes to produce an interview, I would like to know that others have listened to it, and given serious consideration to what was said, which I did.
At the close of the interview, the discussion turned to the importance of doing good. I agree, but my experience with it has been different from that of Dr. Monchy. I was raised in the Catholic church (and left before I finished eighth grade). Great emphasis was placed, by the church, on paying attention to one's sins and confessing them. For me, however, even at that young age, getting rid of every last little bit of sin turned out to be quite a problem, and I was about as much of a model kid as anyone could be. Confession was on Friday, but by Monday I had invariably done something wrong, no matter how small - some fib (ninth commandment), some small lack of obedience to my mother (fifth commandment). I was glad that at the age of ten I hadn't committed murder or coveted my neighbor's wife, but nevertheless, what would happen if I died before I could get to next Friday's confession?
Getting rid of sin can be like learning the piano - those who are content with a mediocre performance are quick to pat themselves on the back (leading to contentment but lack of progress), while the most accomplished pianists are always aware of their shortcomings (leading to lack of contentment, but greater proficiency). Is perfection possible? Not for the pianist, not for the sinner. What to do? What to do? The church had no answers, and for all my effort at getting rid of this sticky thing call sin, I still didn't know God.
The God who is described in the Bible is a moral perfectionist. If I am not morally perfect, then according to the Bible, I stand condemned, even if I am in the top fraction of a percentile when it comes to being "good." We are told no sin will escape the wrath of God because He is holy and holiness does not forgive and forget, it consumes like a fire. The purpose of the blood of Christ was to demonstrate God's wrath against sin, to exact payment for sin. On the cross, the Son of God shed His blood to pay for the sins of women and men. It covers, with forgiveness, those who follow Him in obedience. The blood shed by Jesus Christ is what makes it possible for God to be merciful toward me without compromising His holiness. I am not saying this to preach. I am saying it because it relates to my question (coming up) and because Dr. Monchy suggested that the blood of the Son of God was spilled and blended with the earth, where it did something that has absolutely nothing to do with the real purpose of what took place on Calvary. I cannot continue, in good conscience, without making it clear, first, that I disagree vehemently with what he has said.
Having cleared my conscience, if I may, I will return to grappling with the problem of being good. To put it bluntly, now that I am out of grade school, left to my own devices, I would quickly fall into the category of people who are more than happy to put good aside in order to get ahead. (By the grace of God I have not been left to my own devices, but have taken God up on His promise to give followers of Jesus Christ a new heart, that is able to grow in self-sacrificial love). Without this transformation made possible by God, I have no doubt that I would be quite ruthless. I listened to Dr. Monchy speak, and I heard him say we should be good. I listened to the interview twice. I tried to take this admonition to be good and tie it in to reincarnation, and his associated belief of the spark of god within us all. My first reaction is that if I have this spark of deity within me, heaven help us all, because I assure you, this is not any type of god I would ever want to worship - or be. Secondly, under this scenario, I find myself asking: why not do everything to my advantage in this life, knowing that the only person who will suffer will be the reincarnated me? I will not be aware of myself as the theoretically reincarnated person, so why not kick the can down the road and let the next "me" deal with the consequences of the moral reckless abandon needed by the current "me" to get ahead in this life? I am stating it simplistically, of course, but for all my reading on Gnosticism, and paths of what is often called "enlightenment," I have never found an answer to this question. As Dr. Monchy said, it doesn't all have to happen in this life. So maybe I'll be on the long side and require a couple of hundred lives, but compared to eternity, who cares about a couple thousand years?
That's a real question. Can anybody answer it for me? Why should I be good if skipping that part gets me more of what I want in this life? Yes, really. I would give my life for my faith in Jesus Christ. But in my natural state - the one I was born with, being good just doesn't do that much for me. I'd rather be rich and powerful.
Thank you for such a full and rich reply, it is much appreciated. Our lives are complex but there is a satisfaction in trying to be and do good -- and it's not easy -- that is a great reward even here.
Yes, I hope I explained correctly - it was a hypothetical question. I do not actually mow other people down. Thank you for this very interesting forum.
I think those aspirations are fickle and wont bring you happiness. Karma can affect you in your lifetime, and you only get what you give. Hitler thought he was rich and powerful.
I know a large number of people who live to further their own interests at the expense of others, and they really are happier, and better off, than the ones whom they victimize. They eat healthy food, keep their bodies in shape, promote charities, enjoy prestige and a busy social life. They are not all trying to escape the misery of their existence, as is often portrayed. They get far more than they give. Yes, really. Hitler had a better life than those he sent to the concentration camps, no? And suffered far less. Given the monumental evil for which he was responsible, the fact that he eventually died (somewhere) is hardly adequate recompense. I'm not saying this to argue. I'm saying this to ask - am I missing something? If Hitler comes back as a toad that is cognitively unaware of who he was, where is the justice in that? Where, in the system of Karma, is PERFECT justice?
Firstly, to me there is justice or injustice, not a sliding scale. The line where the scales meet is an absolute. Clearly Humanity has not found that place anywhere, at any time, unless anybody here can provide me with my first example.
Without being too reductive, the question then is .. is justice possible? or a forlorn ideal? Or is injustice simply our default setting? If the latter, then conscience hinders rather than aids in finding the sought after gratifiers.
I'll avoid waffle .. but my years searching reveals a self-correcting mechanism presented in natural law everywhere I look .. with the key variable being time, the key constant being cycles and the electromagnetic field. The correcting mechanism applied from without - as well as within.
The answer to the initial question .. is justice possible? for me then is yes, as sure as the clock will strike 12 at noon. I've come to embrace the same sentiment expressed @ 2 Peter 2;3 at the end of 40 years of eating waffles
It's faith sure, but many now can instinctively feel the external expression materialising .. even if a comfortable internal response remains elusive.
Yes, and 2 Peter continues on to talk about the punishment of evil, which is part of justice. I agree with you - it is not a sliding scale. If we see some justice, mixed with injustice, it is still an unjust system. We won't find justice in this world, and what I have been trying to say is that I am troubled by a system of karma that punishes people after they are no longer even aware of who they were or what they did. There has to be a conscious connection, as in Peter, with an intelligent judge, not an impersonal force. Thank you.
Maybe you should try being bad for a day, to get over it. The people in your life will remember you for being genuine and considerate, not for being perfect. What do you do for fun ? Consider Roger Federer; does he deserve all that money for beating victims at tennis for peoples entertainment ? Most people would say yes, so dont be too hard on yourself. You dont say how old you are, but people can change during their lifetime. Hitler first aspired to be an artist.
Excuse me? Your shift to personal commentary is out of line and your inferences do not follow from what I have written. I'm not trying to "get over" anything. I was asking a question about the apparent inadequacy of this thing called Karma - driven by no laws of physics, no intelligent actor, no operative principle whatsoever, and unable, as far as I can tell, to improve this world, either for particular individuals or for humanity as a whole . I never said I was perfect, I never said I was dissatisfied with my life, nor is the subject of my commentary related to what it is that others remember me for (I don't care what they remember me for, I care about how God assesses my life). I have no idea who Roger Federer is, but do you really think that winning at tennis raises moral issues? I don't understand your point about Hitler's artistic aspirations. Art leads to genocidal behavior? If you can explain the mechanism of Karma as it relates to justice, fine. Fun? I'm not looking for lifestyle advice, thank you.
It could be cos I didnt see your last post. I was looking at your long post on 1st. I dont pretend to understand Christians and God and sin, and you were the one that brought up Hitler and toads. What have they got to do with karma ? I dont think perfect justice exists. I have re-read your commentary again, and doubt that anyone could tell you anything, cos you already have all the answers. I am not even a Christian. I thought that anyone who wins $600 million at sport could be raising a moral issue. Is being super rich a moral issue for you ? What does God say about rich people getting to Heaven ? I am actually a Buddhist.
Christianity is an intellectual rabbit-hole. (That is a euphemism...)
The Pope's crest/shield says 'Compassion and Choice'- they'll sooth a troubled mind back to sleep, but to leave their Matrix means taking ones soul (mind) in to their own hands, which is the only way to become free of the death and rebirth cycle (Samsara) and achieve 'eternal life'. Compassion is still kind for those who are not inclined to think for themselves, though it's rather dangerous these days too.
Mark, I think you would be well served to stop drawing conclusions about others when you don't even know them. I learn from others all the time. I've stated my question about karma multiple times, but you don't respond to it, which is fine. Your question to me? Biblical Christianity is not about what you have but whom you love. It is not about a shallow interpretation of the verses that address this issue. Faith in Jesus Christ asks this question: Do you love yourself or do you choose to deny yourself for love of the Son of God? I chose Jesus Christ. If the money is earned without moral compromise, it is not, in itself, a moral issue and I would have no right to judge the person earning it. Do you love the money? What do you do with it once you have earned it? Are you driven by greed or do you just really like tennis, happen to be good at it, and get paid? Would you give it up if asked?
Bravo for the launch of this series of conversations. For me the depth of discussion afforded by increased time, and the ability to communicate at length about matters that are the life’s Blood of our current reality, was satisfying and valuable. It served for me as a way.to stop worrying and start reflecting. I look forward to more! Thank you!!
I was actually inspired to discover we have this civilised gentleman, Dr de Monchy, living here in New Zealand. A few more like him and we have hope. So thank you for sharing this conversation.
I have studied Nazi Germany, seeking to understand what happened, ever since visiting Germany last century and discovering that I liked Germans, and I have watched with a certain detachment the progress of Covid New Zealand, seeking to understand what is happening. And yet with all this experience and reflection, I still can't quite believe what is happening. You can analyse and analyse the events of the past three years, you can get a fingertip-on-the-cliff-edge grasp on it, but you can never see the whole continent, there is something ineffable about what is going on.
I've long been cautious about using the word 'spiritual' because it's a term that's been highjacked by so many political, social and commercial agendas over the years. But it's clear that the materialistic impetus that is driving us all along, leaving a few of us eddying on the margins perhaps, but liable to be sucked into the flow at any moment, it is clear that this impetus can't be resisted with materialistic means. The forces driving all this are too powerful. So we must find something non-materialistic, to do with value and love and respect and the will to do good. A heart to heart connection.
Bearing in mind that the way to a person's heart - their core - may be via religion, the intellect, the body, the things they love doing. We're all different but we must find that core commonality, the one thing we all value. When you're in love you can resist anything.
His ideas of evolution of consciousness are neat. It's so good to hear a doctor speak like this.
FWIW; Reincarnation is a principle of consciousness; consciousness is reborn in to flesh to continue its journey towards the Absolute- nothing learned is forgotten, experience and knowledge is accrued via the physical body- but personal memory dies with the physical body.
Thank you gentlemen for sharing your insightful discourse.
A thought that entertained me was the stark dichotomy of Western materialist thinking from its tribal African roots. It reveals to me how successful the Luciferian inversion program has been. For instance, the belief of the majority that potentially injuring or sacrificing children with an experimental new technology in the hope that it will save the elderly. When the tribal view is the old will wander onto an ice flow or into the bush to make way for the young. That the flu was an old mans' best friend, to enable the feeble to expire gracefully and in dignity and not linger on for years in a vegetative state exhausting precious health resources. How ironic then that the majority in NZ voted for euthenasia reform, but covid led to a situation where youths suffered and died in an attempt to save the frail all because of the cognitive dissonance brought about by carefully machinated propaganda programming.
The ultimate inversion is that the universe is not evolving, and man is not evolving in it, entropic devolution means we are in decent as a species. But this video confirms that some men personally choose and aspire to fight the prevailing atmosphere of dissonance and depreciation as human beings.
The aristocratic families that have ruled man since before Christ are still ruling. The sock puppets like Rutte, Biden and Ardern et.al. are modelled off the Caesars' who answered to the Venetian nobility, as the Black Pope does today. Rome was never conquered, it just hid, manifestations occurred in Hitler's attempted reestablishment of the Holy (sic) Roman Empire, and more recently the Forth Reich or Schwab's forth industrial revolution. I believe these shadow rulers of the world are very fearful that their power and influence are threatened and they need to act fast and by establishing a global Feudalistic Fascism maintain their dominance.
It is a war, a battle between the centuries old inbred aristocratic families of Europe, and the common man, who despite what the inbreeds believe are far smarter and wiser than they are. The former having to rely on academics from the common classes, it is these who must be shamed and hindered.
I'm sorry I've gone on too much. I only wanted to thank you for sharing....I now find it hard to delete the waffle.
Anyway be assured that we love you all in the resistance, it is the same evil that was at work in the 20th century, we can conquer it.
All the best.
Kev.
You have not gone on too much, you have enriched our discussion, thank you so very much!
Congratulations, Emanuel, on your inaugural interview format!!!
This is relaxed yet deeply philosophical and much appreciated conversation between two exceptional individuals who are dedicated to the cause of human liberty. It's unfortunate that they have been persecuted for expressing objections to the science of the covid jab. That's what totalitarian states do: they go after the best and the brightest because it is such individuals who insist that human beings are treated ethically. How does one counter the evil inherent in a totalitarian system? Well, the answer is right here in this video: act with goodness; do as much good as you possibly can.
Thank you so much for your kind words and support!
Thank you for the interview with Dr. Monchy. I'm writing this note because, even though I do not hold to the same beliefs, if I had put in all the work it takes to produce an interview, I would like to know that others have listened to it, and given serious consideration to what was said, which I did.
At the close of the interview, the discussion turned to the importance of doing good. I agree, but my experience with it has been different from that of Dr. Monchy. I was raised in the Catholic church (and left before I finished eighth grade). Great emphasis was placed, by the church, on paying attention to one's sins and confessing them. For me, however, even at that young age, getting rid of every last little bit of sin turned out to be quite a problem, and I was about as much of a model kid as anyone could be. Confession was on Friday, but by Monday I had invariably done something wrong, no matter how small - some fib (ninth commandment), some small lack of obedience to my mother (fifth commandment). I was glad that at the age of ten I hadn't committed murder or coveted my neighbor's wife, but nevertheless, what would happen if I died before I could get to next Friday's confession?
Getting rid of sin can be like learning the piano - those who are content with a mediocre performance are quick to pat themselves on the back (leading to contentment but lack of progress), while the most accomplished pianists are always aware of their shortcomings (leading to lack of contentment, but greater proficiency). Is perfection possible? Not for the pianist, not for the sinner. What to do? What to do? The church had no answers, and for all my effort at getting rid of this sticky thing call sin, I still didn't know God.
The God who is described in the Bible is a moral perfectionist. If I am not morally perfect, then according to the Bible, I stand condemned, even if I am in the top fraction of a percentile when it comes to being "good." We are told no sin will escape the wrath of God because He is holy and holiness does not forgive and forget, it consumes like a fire. The purpose of the blood of Christ was to demonstrate God's wrath against sin, to exact payment for sin. On the cross, the Son of God shed His blood to pay for the sins of women and men. It covers, with forgiveness, those who follow Him in obedience. The blood shed by Jesus Christ is what makes it possible for God to be merciful toward me without compromising His holiness. I am not saying this to preach. I am saying it because it relates to my question (coming up) and because Dr. Monchy suggested that the blood of the Son of God was spilled and blended with the earth, where it did something that has absolutely nothing to do with the real purpose of what took place on Calvary. I cannot continue, in good conscience, without making it clear, first, that I disagree vehemently with what he has said.
Having cleared my conscience, if I may, I will return to grappling with the problem of being good. To put it bluntly, now that I am out of grade school, left to my own devices, I would quickly fall into the category of people who are more than happy to put good aside in order to get ahead. (By the grace of God I have not been left to my own devices, but have taken God up on His promise to give followers of Jesus Christ a new heart, that is able to grow in self-sacrificial love). Without this transformation made possible by God, I have no doubt that I would be quite ruthless. I listened to Dr. Monchy speak, and I heard him say we should be good. I listened to the interview twice. I tried to take this admonition to be good and tie it in to reincarnation, and his associated belief of the spark of god within us all. My first reaction is that if I have this spark of deity within me, heaven help us all, because I assure you, this is not any type of god I would ever want to worship - or be. Secondly, under this scenario, I find myself asking: why not do everything to my advantage in this life, knowing that the only person who will suffer will be the reincarnated me? I will not be aware of myself as the theoretically reincarnated person, so why not kick the can down the road and let the next "me" deal with the consequences of the moral reckless abandon needed by the current "me" to get ahead in this life? I am stating it simplistically, of course, but for all my reading on Gnosticism, and paths of what is often called "enlightenment," I have never found an answer to this question. As Dr. Monchy said, it doesn't all have to happen in this life. So maybe I'll be on the long side and require a couple of hundred lives, but compared to eternity, who cares about a couple thousand years?
That's a real question. Can anybody answer it for me? Why should I be good if skipping that part gets me more of what I want in this life? Yes, really. I would give my life for my faith in Jesus Christ. But in my natural state - the one I was born with, being good just doesn't do that much for me. I'd rather be rich and powerful.
Thank you for such a full and rich reply, it is much appreciated. Our lives are complex but there is a satisfaction in trying to be and do good -- and it's not easy -- that is a great reward even here.
Yes, I hope I explained correctly - it was a hypothetical question. I do not actually mow other people down. Thank you for this very interesting forum.
I think those aspirations are fickle and wont bring you happiness. Karma can affect you in your lifetime, and you only get what you give. Hitler thought he was rich and powerful.
I know a large number of people who live to further their own interests at the expense of others, and they really are happier, and better off, than the ones whom they victimize. They eat healthy food, keep their bodies in shape, promote charities, enjoy prestige and a busy social life. They are not all trying to escape the misery of their existence, as is often portrayed. They get far more than they give. Yes, really. Hitler had a better life than those he sent to the concentration camps, no? And suffered far less. Given the monumental evil for which he was responsible, the fact that he eventually died (somewhere) is hardly adequate recompense. I'm not saying this to argue. I'm saying this to ask - am I missing something? If Hitler comes back as a toad that is cognitively unaware of who he was, where is the justice in that? Where, in the system of Karma, is PERFECT justice?
Firstly, to me there is justice or injustice, not a sliding scale. The line where the scales meet is an absolute. Clearly Humanity has not found that place anywhere, at any time, unless anybody here can provide me with my first example.
Without being too reductive, the question then is .. is justice possible? or a forlorn ideal? Or is injustice simply our default setting? If the latter, then conscience hinders rather than aids in finding the sought after gratifiers.
I'll avoid waffle .. but my years searching reveals a self-correcting mechanism presented in natural law everywhere I look .. with the key variable being time, the key constant being cycles and the electromagnetic field. The correcting mechanism applied from without - as well as within.
The answer to the initial question .. is justice possible? for me then is yes, as sure as the clock will strike 12 at noon. I've come to embrace the same sentiment expressed @ 2 Peter 2;3 at the end of 40 years of eating waffles
It's faith sure, but many now can instinctively feel the external expression materialising .. even if a comfortable internal response remains elusive.
I enjoyed your comments.
Go well.
Yes, and 2 Peter continues on to talk about the punishment of evil, which is part of justice. I agree with you - it is not a sliding scale. If we see some justice, mixed with injustice, it is still an unjust system. We won't find justice in this world, and what I have been trying to say is that I am troubled by a system of karma that punishes people after they are no longer even aware of who they were or what they did. There has to be a conscious connection, as in Peter, with an intelligent judge, not an impersonal force. Thank you.
Maybe you should try being bad for a day, to get over it. The people in your life will remember you for being genuine and considerate, not for being perfect. What do you do for fun ? Consider Roger Federer; does he deserve all that money for beating victims at tennis for peoples entertainment ? Most people would say yes, so dont be too hard on yourself. You dont say how old you are, but people can change during their lifetime. Hitler first aspired to be an artist.
Excuse me? Your shift to personal commentary is out of line and your inferences do not follow from what I have written. I'm not trying to "get over" anything. I was asking a question about the apparent inadequacy of this thing called Karma - driven by no laws of physics, no intelligent actor, no operative principle whatsoever, and unable, as far as I can tell, to improve this world, either for particular individuals or for humanity as a whole . I never said I was perfect, I never said I was dissatisfied with my life, nor is the subject of my commentary related to what it is that others remember me for (I don't care what they remember me for, I care about how God assesses my life). I have no idea who Roger Federer is, but do you really think that winning at tennis raises moral issues? I don't understand your point about Hitler's artistic aspirations. Art leads to genocidal behavior? If you can explain the mechanism of Karma as it relates to justice, fine. Fun? I'm not looking for lifestyle advice, thank you.
It could be cos I didnt see your last post. I was looking at your long post on 1st. I dont pretend to understand Christians and God and sin, and you were the one that brought up Hitler and toads. What have they got to do with karma ? I dont think perfect justice exists. I have re-read your commentary again, and doubt that anyone could tell you anything, cos you already have all the answers. I am not even a Christian. I thought that anyone who wins $600 million at sport could be raising a moral issue. Is being super rich a moral issue for you ? What does God say about rich people getting to Heaven ? I am actually a Buddhist.
Christianity is an intellectual rabbit-hole. (That is a euphemism...)
The Pope's crest/shield says 'Compassion and Choice'- they'll sooth a troubled mind back to sleep, but to leave their Matrix means taking ones soul (mind) in to their own hands, which is the only way to become free of the death and rebirth cycle (Samsara) and achieve 'eternal life'. Compassion is still kind for those who are not inclined to think for themselves, though it's rather dangerous these days too.
Mark, I think you would be well served to stop drawing conclusions about others when you don't even know them. I learn from others all the time. I've stated my question about karma multiple times, but you don't respond to it, which is fine. Your question to me? Biblical Christianity is not about what you have but whom you love. It is not about a shallow interpretation of the verses that address this issue. Faith in Jesus Christ asks this question: Do you love yourself or do you choose to deny yourself for love of the Son of God? I chose Jesus Christ. If the money is earned without moral compromise, it is not, in itself, a moral issue and I would have no right to judge the person earning it. Do you love the money? What do you do with it once you have earned it? Are you driven by greed or do you just really like tennis, happen to be good at it, and get paid? Would you give it up if asked?
Bravo for the launch of this series of conversations. For me the depth of discussion afforded by increased time, and the ability to communicate at length about matters that are the life’s Blood of our current reality, was satisfying and valuable. It served for me as a way.to stop worrying and start reflecting. I look forward to more! Thank you!!
I was actually inspired to discover we have this civilised gentleman, Dr de Monchy, living here in New Zealand. A few more like him and we have hope. So thank you for sharing this conversation.
I have studied Nazi Germany, seeking to understand what happened, ever since visiting Germany last century and discovering that I liked Germans, and I have watched with a certain detachment the progress of Covid New Zealand, seeking to understand what is happening. And yet with all this experience and reflection, I still can't quite believe what is happening. You can analyse and analyse the events of the past three years, you can get a fingertip-on-the-cliff-edge grasp on it, but you can never see the whole continent, there is something ineffable about what is going on.
I've long been cautious about using the word 'spiritual' because it's a term that's been highjacked by so many political, social and commercial agendas over the years. But it's clear that the materialistic impetus that is driving us all along, leaving a few of us eddying on the margins perhaps, but liable to be sucked into the flow at any moment, it is clear that this impetus can't be resisted with materialistic means. The forces driving all this are too powerful. So we must find something non-materialistic, to do with value and love and respect and the will to do good. A heart to heart connection.
Bearing in mind that the way to a person's heart - their core - may be via religion, the intellect, the body, the things they love doing. We're all different but we must find that core commonality, the one thing we all value. When you're in love you can resist anything.
Marvellous man de Monchy.
His ideas of evolution of consciousness are neat. It's so good to hear a doctor speak like this.
FWIW; Reincarnation is a principle of consciousness; consciousness is reborn in to flesh to continue its journey towards the Absolute- nothing learned is forgotten, experience and knowledge is accrued via the physical body- but personal memory dies with the physical body.
Good interview. Really enjoyed it.