196 Comments

Those who received the exemptions and remained quiet have blood on their hands, Its that simple to me.

I wonder how well they are sleeping today?

Utu.

Expand full comment
author

You are absolutely correct.

Expand full comment

Like babies I suspect. 🙄💣🕳️💩

Expand full comment
author

maybe they have colic?

Expand full comment

From what I've gathered babies with colic don't sleep well... 🤔

Expand full comment
deletedOct 27, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
author

There is a lot of hearsay and rumour about what went on ... we are trying to ascertain who received the exemptions, e.g., which groups, how long they lasted, etc. I will be speaking with one of the people who has been filing Official Information Act requests about these issues next week. Thank you for your interest and your comments.

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

G'day NZD, very interesting indeed. Meanwhile your cousin's across the ditch in Oz would have experienced, I suspect, very similar, behind the scenes, skulduggery. Brief background; at commencement of this fictional "virus" our then PM (I can't bear to mention its name) convened an illegal National Cabinet, whereby all of our State Premiers & Territory leaders, CHO'S, Captain's of industry, quite possibly Church leaders, Charity leader's, etc met to discuss how to roll out this farce. They still meet to this day. My suggestion, to many of the so called "freedom fighters" is to gather support from all of their contacts & followers & swamp the Federal government with FOI requests for ALL of the UNREDACTED documents from this fake Cabinet, right from the get go. I have stated in my respectful request(s) that these documents have quite literally, affected ALL Australian's & if fully revealed could/ should/would reunite our fractured communities. By exposing the truth about the treachery perpetrated upon all of us, the "vaccinated" would would definitely see that they were conned & that the "unvaccinated" were just trying to warn people. Both camps should support this common goal for truth as a pathway of healing, with no hard feelings. Result so far, zip. I'll just keep having a go. Keep going, you are appreciated.👍🇦🇺😃

Expand full comment
author

That is an excellent suggestion and we are attempting to do that, there is much more data to obtain even on this story alone: Thank You!

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Roc Findlay, "no hard feelings"? Sorry. those 11,005 knew that they were throwing everyone else under the bus,

To suggest an Amnesty is poppycock, particular because the exempt were self-serving and didn't give a rip about anyone else.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/

Expand full comment
author

Thank you, I agree.

Expand full comment

G'day NZD, who's position do you agree with, mine or Hilary's? Hilary missed the point, I am not talking about amnesties, I'm talking about a meeting of minds, from both sides, to repair the damage done to our people's & countries. I've got no time for any of those traitorous Doctors nurses or whoever has turned their backs on their fellow man/ woman. Could you please clarify your position.

Expand full comment
author

I believe there has to be a meeting of the minds. As a psychoanalyst I am all for talking, meeting and exchanging, etc. And as for the traitors, they should be culpable.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023

I didn't miss the point.

In my first reply I was discussing the topic of the substack, nothing else, but the article was discussing ordinary people, and there, meeting of the minds won't be easy, because no-one I know who didn't take the jab, will compromise that position. nor should they....

Doing nothing is the default position. It's those who took the jab, who need to re-evaluate, which means there are three groups... a) those forced to take it, who contrary to Hipkins, had no choice, - and many of them didn't want to - with those it's more possible to meet minds... and b) those who willing took it and excoriated those who didn't and c) those who didn't even think and just did it. The latter two are much harder to talk to.

In daily life, it's rarer than a triangular moon in my experience, that those wedded to the jabs and still boosting themselves, who have often had covid three times or more, and were lucky enough to escape vaccine injury, will ever meet minds.

Many of them are still masking, even while driving in their cars, and love to say that without the jab they would have died from covid. Most of the provaccine zealots I've met appear to have addled logic, still consider the unvaxxed to be traitors to the cause, and consider the great unwashed to be a blight on the face of the earth.

For them to see that they had the wool pulled over their eyes, is an insult to their perceived self-assessment of their high intelligence. And it would also take value out of their virtue signalling as well, which some of them still do.

The only vaccinated people I know, who are even thinking things through logically, are the ones who got "hit" after the vaccination, and are now paying the ultimate price.

So far, they are the only ones prepared to have a meeting of minds, but it's an atrocious way to reach that point.

For the others, there can be no meeting of minds until they recognise that they were sold a pig in a poke, which they willingly agreed to, and if they indulged in social media trolling and seriously nasty comments, that they apologise, and mean it.

Some of the behaviour on internet was so bad, that if that is still considered a virtuous narrative to those who slagged off, then what will happen the next time?

And there will be a next time.

obviously there are those I've not met, like some of the provaccine who were at the parliamentary protest, who didn't agree with mandates, but still opted for the vaccine anyway.

Expand full comment
author

We have a difficult fight on our hands ... may I refer you to an earlier essay of mine on the 'dividing line' or 'the great divide'? thank you for commenting so extensively.

Expand full comment

Why? Why would an appeal for All Humans To Think Alike On An Issue result in anything less than everyone feeling justified in waiting for that to happen, however long that takes?

We're doing this now. We're waiting for the people in decision-making power to act like the surrogate Mommies & Daddies we want them to be. People will wait forever for Surrogate Love. How do YOU not KNOW this?

Expand full comment

Hi NZ doc, have looked back through the titles under archives, and it's difficult to tell which particular one you are referring me to. Do you have a more specific pointer please?

Expand full comment

Wholeheartedly agree with what you are saying Hilary. There was so much vitriol online and just anywhere by those who thought the vaccine was something made in heaven and an obligation for people to do "the right thing". Some of the things I heard were horrifying. In fact this was where you saw people's true colours came out.

Expand full comment

Well, while you are talking around the effects of everyone's passivity, that's a Core Problem here. The people in decision-making power aren't going to incriminate THEMSELVES or voluntarily reject these amounts of $ http://allaregreen.us/, yet you're speaking as if leaving All The Factors that force people to get potentially lethal jabs are negligible: "some people DO get to decide to not get the jab."

A father of 4 was refused surgery & died from THAT because the medical system employees passively refused to believe that corrupt paid politicians would lie. We are ACTIVELY killing people to retain A Belief while simultaneously pretending that we're not.

That's on ALL of us. Whether your passivity comes from waiting for Everyone To Think Alike or waiting for the problem(s) to resolves it or themselves, the people are Just As Dead.

Can we please discuss SOLUTIONS to this?

Expand full comment
author

Go ahead

Expand full comment

"In my first reply I was discussing the topic of the substack, nothing else.."

Actually you were replying to Roc Findlay's comment, not a general reply to the topic. I really dislike gaslighting. Primarily because it demands compliance to a twisting of the truth or a confrontation.

As I said, it's weird and it doesn't work to make a point only to foster false compliance or argument.

Expand full comment
author

I have no idea what you're talking about

Expand full comment

Roc Findlay said, " Both camps should support this common goal for truth as a pathway of healing, with no hard feelings."

My reply to HIM was "Roc Findlay, "no hard feelings"? Sorry. those 11,005 knew that they were throwing everyone else under the bus,

To suggest an Amnesty is poppycock, particular because the exempt were self-serving and didn't give a rip about anyone else.

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/covid-response-forgiveness/671879/

The topic of the substack was the 11,005 workers who are alleged to have been given exemptions. That was what I adressed there.

To suggest that both camps - the vaccinated (and exempt) and the unvaccinated have a meeting of minds is what sparked the posting of the link to the Atlantic article... because that is the vaccinated version of a "meeting of minds". It's what the vaccinated say when they can't face the truth.

For there to be any meeting of minds, the vaccinated are going to have to own their misjudgments, their resultant words and their abuse of the unvaccinated on social media and in society, without making excuses or blaming someone else. Like, "It wasn't our fault, because we didn't know the experts would be wrong... blah blah." It doesn't matter if the experts are wrong. You just don't treat people like that, because IF the vaccines worked, whether someone else was vaccinated or not should be immaterial to the vaccinated.

Now, please tell me what the gaslighting was all about.

Expand full comment

Wrong Hilary, at no time did I mention an amnesty with any of the 11,000 plus. Please re-read my comments, your statement is offensive.

Expand full comment

Do you mean the statement I have just made above, is offensive or the original one?

There was no offense intended. These are experiences which most of us unjabbed have lived with for nearly two years. What I put above is a statement of fact.

I would be interested to hear what you think is offensive in anything I have said above.

Expand full comment

The destruction of New Zealand's fabric and soul rested on the collusion of groomed business leaders, bureaucrats and politicians. The betrayal by the NZ MSM was already well established.

What we saw was a circular conglomeration of self-supporting plausible deniability. What is now confirmed (and was suspected) is the existence of a body of self-interested traitors who took their 30 pieces of silver and literally wrecked whatever scant trust may still have existed in the NZ health service.

As a mandated PhD clinician, bereft of work and income, I will not forget those traitors who could have helped change the course of New Zealand history and scuppered the appallingly contrived 'social licence' (and NZ BORA) that was tyrannically imposed on the populace by invertebrate politicians, fuelled and fanned by greed riven NZ business leaders, virtue signalling ESG obsessed institutional leaders in universities, and a legion of bowing, money fuelled GPs and their acolytes across the HPCA cartel.

Expand full comment
author

We are up against lawless criminals who have destroyed and are destroying many lives.

Expand full comment
author

You said it. Thanks for commenting!

Expand full comment

A brilliant piece of work that may have the Disinformation Unit act out the Oozlum Bird...

https://malagabay.wordpress.com/2014/02/02/the-physics-of-the-oozlum-bird/

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Dr. Garcia, Can you do a public records request to get the list of the number and type of medical positions that were granted exemptions?

Expand full comment
author

We are working on it ... much more data to obtain, thank you!

Expand full comment

Of course! I should have known!!!! Thank you for your courageous and time consuming work.

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Yes please

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023·edited Apr 14Liked by NewZealandDoc

None of this was about our health, that much is clear.

Relatedly:

Grabien: Rules Are For the Lab Rats

June 16, 2023

https://grabien.com/story.php?id=427753

Hat tip: "one law for thee, another for me," June 16, 2023

https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/flashback-friday-one-law-for-thee

TRANSCRIPT

TEXT ON SCREEN: RULES FOR THEE NOT FOR ME

MALE TV REPORTER: Tonight while Governor [of California] Newsom is telling all of us to have Thanksgiving dinner outside, he's facing some new fallout for that fancy birthday dinner party he went to at the French Laundry.*

[cut]

GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM: It was in Napa which is the orange status, relatively loose compared to some other counties. Ah, it was to be an outdoor ah, ah, restaurant.

[cut]

ANOTHER MALE TV REPORTER: Raising some new questions about the governor's claims that the dinner was outdoors, as he has repeatedly claimed.

[cut]

GOVERNOR GAVIN NEWSOM: And I let my guard down, and I apologize for it.

[cut]

FEMALE TV REPORTER: Mayor [of Chicago] Lori Lightfoot has been adamant that people stay home and socially distance for weeks.

[cut]

MAYOR LORI LIGHTFOOT: I can't make this any clearer. You absolutely must stay at home. We will cite you. And of we need to we will arrest you and we will take you to jail. Period. There should be nothing unambiguous about that.

[cut]

WHOOPI GOLDBERG: I guess you would all imagine that a lot of people were surprised when she made a trip to the hair salon.

[cut]

MAYOR LORI LIGHTFOOT: I take my personal hygiene very seriously. As I said, I felt like I needed to um, have a haircut.

[cut]

VOICE OF FEMALE TV REPORTER: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi under fire tonight after security footage showed her inside a San Francisco hair salon that's closed to the general public.

[cut]

SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE NANCY PELOSI: It was a set up. So I take responsibility for falling for a setup. And that's all I'm going to say on that. [cut] I think that they owe, that the salon owes me an apology.

[cut]

TUCKER CARLSON: Almost immediately after telling the rest of New York City to stay inside for example, Mayor Bill De Blasio loaded up his SUV with government bodyguards and headed for the gym across town in Brooklyn.

[cut]

MAYOR BILL DE BLASIO: I need exercise. And again, I have to stay healthy so I can make the decisions for the people of this city.

[cut]

VOICE OF FEMALE TV REPORTER: The leader is embroiled in controversy for attending a party at 10 Downing Street in May of 2020. At the time, the country was under a strict government-imposed lockdown.

[cut]

UK PRIME MINISTER BORIS JOHNSON: That I myself fell short when it came to observing the very rules which the government I lead had introduced to protect the public—

[cut]

CANADIAN PRIME MINISTER JUSTIN TRUDEAU: Let's put into practice what it truly means to love our neighbors as ourselves by making sacrifices to protect their health. Let's stay home for them.

[cut]

TUCKER CARLSON: Not long after recording the video you just saw, Trudeau left the capital and traveled all the way to Quebec to visit his family at their lake house. Just like you'd want to do on Easter, if you were allowed to do that. But you're not allowed. So stop complaining.

[cut]

VOICE OF MALE TV REPORTER: Former president tweeted: "It might be Labor Day weekend, but let's all remember that we're still in the middle of a pandemic. Wear a mask, practice social distancing, and follow the experts. It'll save lives."

Former President can be seen in pictures hitting the dance floor without a mask or told that he danced all night and had a great time.

[cut]

MALE TV REPORTER: San Francisco mayor London Breed was defiant today when asked about video of her without a mask at a nightclub earlier this week.

[cut]

MAYOR LONDON BREED: I got up and started dancing because I was feeling the spirit. And I wasn't thinking about a mask. I was thinking about having a good time—

[cut]

MALE TV REPORTER: Mayor Steve Adler's apologizing tonight for traveling to Mexico with a group of family and friends last month despite urging Austinites to stay home.

[cut]

MALE TV REPORTER: As he issued this message on the night of November 9th.

MAYOR STEVE ADLER: And then we need to, you know, stay home if you can.

MALE TV REPORTER: He was doing it from a time share in Cabo San Lucas.

[cut]

MAYOR STEVE ADLER: Sorry I took that trip. Ah, it was a lapse in judgement.

[cut]

FEMALE TV REPORTER: Governor [of Michigan] Whitmer is facing some backlash after a picture surfaced of her dining at a restaurant with at least 12 other people at a table, a violation of the state Health Department's epidemic order.

[cut]

GOVERNOR GRETCHEN WHITMER: It's, you know, it was an honest mistake and I, I have apologized for it.

[cut]

ROD MELONI: Well, you know, the governor spent a lot of time asking Michiganers not to go on spring break, particularly in Florida. It took the governor's office a couple of months to confirm it, but she indeed flew from Lansing to West Palm Beach in a private jet on March 12th, spent the weekend with her father, and headed back to Lansing on March 15th.

[cut]

TUCKER CARLSON: Again and again they do the very things they punish us for doing. When they're caught, they acknowledge no shame. They are entirely lacking in self-awareness. They have no idea how absurd they are.

4:03

[END]

#   #   #

TRANSCRIBER'S NOTES:

* French Laundry is a stunningly expensive 3 star Michelin restaurant in California's Napa Valley. It's official website is https://www.thomaskeller.com/tfl

Expand full comment
author

incredibly apt, as always, thank you!

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Here's a compilation of "Lockdown Hypocrites," lest we forget ...

https://old.reddit.com/r/LockdownHypocrites/

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

This is profoundly disturbing and if they were doctors who were exempted and said nothing then in my mind they are as disgusting and cowardly as Doomfield et al. They should have stood up and shouted from the roof tops. I have friends who died because they were denied exemptions. I see Doomfield, Ardern, Hipkins as nothing more than murderers.

Expand full comment
author

They're worse ...

Expand full comment

Premeditating, calculating, amoral sociopaths in the pay and graces of the WEF/WHO.

Expand full comment

I have done rather a long post on Chris Hipkins. Or Chris Shitkins as he should be known.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/chris-hipkins-41st-prime-minister

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Great thank you. I'll read it now. We call him Shitkins too. He is like a scared little school boy hall monitor trying to be a bully but looking like am moron.

Expand full comment

Of course he was head boy in the Hutt school.

And perhaps we could say head yob as PM!

Expand full comment

That has to be a female, doesn't it?

Expand full comment

Sorry Madeline I don't follow. What has to be a female?

Expand full comment

Every time I see Chris Hipkins I get a very clear female vibe.

I saw a video of Jacinda Ardern wearing a red dress with something very wobbly in the wrong place for a female.

New Zealand has a massive and aggressive pro-trans cohort, such that the "Let Women Speak" leader Kellie-Jay Keen was assaulted by a mass, and not protected by police.

I watch and wonder

Expand full comment

And THEN what? You The People would have supported them in anything other than an empty rhetorical way as they got taken away like Julian Assange? Or attacked until they had to leave the country like Dr. Andrew Wakefield & his family for doing exactly as you suggest?

You cowards Keep Calling For 'Someone' to fight this for you because you all haven't got the balls. EVERY Western nation has that politicians are Private Citizens like you & me with no exemptions from Any Laws built right into them. WE could build a movement Too Big To Dismiss or Block with fewer people than are on this one page using laws Already In Place.

But I can't find a single other person with any courage to try.

Expand full comment
author

Hey buddy, I gave up my job for my principles, and people are struggling to fight back against tyranny.

Expand full comment

That's great. You won the "it's About Me" sweepstakes. People are dying from the jab. But let's all take a pause & congratulate you for not being okay with this & telling us so Every Chance You Get. & in such an effective manner.

That's like the time people gathered in protest in the streets & got attacked, arrested put on lists then said "I did my part." They made it about Getting Attention too.

The jabs don't mandate themselves. We can't get them un-mandated unless those who have control over such policy change or we take that control away. Since THAT is The Goal here what has anyone done to achieve this?

Try to remember this time that while I am asking you a question, I ain't asking what you've done. This is about ending mandates that do harm. Nothing else needs to be discussed. No one has achieved this or is en route towards achieving it. Everyone is simply sticking to their own paradigms defensively as if THAT has become The Goal.

So in essence, everyone talking has switched what the goal SHOULD BE to something they've already done or said, then stopped there & the harms still continue. & to preempt the whole 'protest works' paradigm, please provide any examples of something that was protested away. Preferably on the First Try.

Expand full comment
author

What are you doing?

Expand full comment

I give up. What does what I am doing or not doing have to do with anything? And oh gee, the Entire Point of informing the public (what you're doing) is so that it could lead to action, right? & I just pointed out here that we can charge, arrest & prosecute all involved in harming us with these illegal mandates.

So I already did more than anyone else in that useless style of measuring things. I progressed TO that next step.

What is everyone else waiting for?

Expand full comment
author

Isn't that what wakaminenga is now doing?

Expand full comment
author

From another OIA ​(HNZ00027972) referencing the one about the 12A exemptions: All those who received 12A exemptions per the previous response (ref. HNZ00029378) were in

health-related work.

Expand full comment

I have an OIA for the same request that states 6706 total exemptions. Signed by the same woman in Sept 22. This deserves some investigation!

Expand full comment
author

I'm looking into it, I've spoken to several lawyers today who confirm the 11,005. More soon, thank you.

Expand full comment

Unbelievable but both predictable and revealing. Nothing but the pantomime of a pandemic. At the rest, unbridled, murderous tyranny.

Expand full comment

I’ve written it up - see my latest post

Expand full comment

Thank you, Ursula, :-)

Expand full comment
author

Guy Hatchard has also reported on this matter, with additional info.

Expand full comment
author

These are medical exemptions, I've seen that I think .... not SSD exemptions. There is confusion because ostensibly SSD exemptions required medical exemptions ... but that doesn't seem to be the case.

Expand full comment

Do not forget that MPs were also given exemptions on the same basis of ‘significant disruption to services’ !

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

There is, sadly, a relatively simistic answer as to who & why these 11,000.. The truth is that your corrupt Gov knew that the health system couldn't handle the many not taking the jab. So, they dreamt up a clandestine plan to subvert this occurring. Gov has & always be corrupt. If nothing else, the past 4 years has educated many people as to this fact alone. Sad, but true.

Expand full comment

Ironically the unclotshotted were forbidden entry to public buildings, during the height of the mandates, except, it would now seem, if they worked there.

Wonder what the fear driven patients would have thought had they known, given the paranoia against *unvaxed* at the time.

Great reporting, thank you.

Expand full comment
author

and thank you for reading and commenting ... the ironies are indescribable, aren't they?

Expand full comment

Yes... "And by the way, your Dr was unvaxed."

We need names.

Expand full comment

Frankly Dr. Garcia? From my perspective in National Socialist Brutish Columbia (mask mandates in place again today), the only way these criminals will ever "be held to account" will be when they're publicly strung up by their ankles the way Mussolini and his girlfriend were strung up by theirs, by the Italian Partisans... 🙄

Why the entire planet isn't in open violent revolt at this point is incomprehensible to me... 🤔

Expand full comment

AMEN!

Expand full comment

100% agree. They are criminally insane and society needs to be rid of them. All of them.

Expand full comment

They are quite sane -- on one level, anyway. The 19th Century had very useful but in our enlightened, morally relative times we have abandoned these terms: "Moral Imbeciles" and "Morally Insane".

Expand full comment

I guess they are psychopaths, or whatever the correct term is, so yes they are fully cognisant of what they are doing, if that's what you mean.

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

I bet that wicked PM JA didnt get the shot

Expand full comment
author

Was she essential?

Expand full comment
Oct 4, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

We could have done without her.

Expand full comment
author

but keep in mind that puppets are replaceable

Expand full comment

Then how come we've been stuck Up Here with Justine Castreau for the past 8-9 years?!

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Thank you for sharing this information. I have wondered how many people of prominence have avoided being jabbed globally.

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

You should now ask through FOI for a breakdown of who got exemptions eg: nr of doctors, nurses, administrators, CEOs and board members etc

Expand full comment
author

We are trying just that, there's more to come

Expand full comment

Thank you for the article. Cross-posted to my readers along with the work of Dr Ursula Edgington on https://informedheart.substack.com/ and Dr Guy Hatchard at hatchardreport.media

This is what I told my readers regarding the matter:

A reader asked me again today (para) 'why are they doing this. I cannot wrap my head around it.'

Good people (like my dear reader) are in asymmetrical warfare with the state and they do not know it. The people in the power structure do what they want using any excuse (SOE real or perceived) and the in-group power structure protects them. They are lawless. Rules are for proles as in the NZ example. Do not comply.

Expand full comment
Oct 3, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

My pleasure NZD, we all MUST unite, as one, to expose their outrageous behaviour. If we get the documents they are cooked.The 🖋️ is mightier than the 🗡️. Edward Bulwer-Lytton

Expand full comment

We are on the write side of history.

Expand full comment

Which is why we 'right'!

Expand full comment