Why and What Do We Need to Know?
As someone who does drafting, I was lucky enough to learn it by pencil and paper first then transitioned to computer assisted drafting, or as its called, CAD. In it, you work in a virtual space that is technically large enough as to be unlimited. You can draw or model a huge stadium, or a tiny circuitboard, all in real size. You can zoom out so the stadium is but a pinprick in size, or zoom in so far that the circuitboard seems like a giant landscape. And you can erase them both with a click. So what is lost in doing CAD from hand drafting is, imo, any REAL human 'sense of scale' and 'sense of caution'. The scale itself is accurate, but rather, the humans ability to really grasp exactly how big or small an object is quite compromised. Process time is compressed. This is what I call 'computer graphics and design' issues. Objects designed in this virtual world are divorced from the laws of nature until after they are designed and fabricated. It is a serious problem, and 'computer simulations' are divorced from reality similarly. It's little wonder they have contributed to the mess we are currently in. Our ability to design and make beautiful things has not been improved with CAD and computers. It ain't real in there.
I really appreciated reading this. Thank you.
The battle for hearts and minds was always a military strategy. Now with this technology its no longer a battle and the heart is ignored.
Its purely focused on mind control.
Graphene is a relative newcomer and just another additive that allows the speeding up of all the processes. A superconductor that has incredible data transfer rates. The blue fibres being found in our blood, sputum , urine, semen and skin are used for this purpose, have a definitive polarity and what appears dendritic at one end . This is a bio synthetic nano tech development that has been well documented and traced back at least 18 years now.
With the human mind now at the forefront of this undeclared, sneaky, cowardly, hidden, evil and Machiavellian war on humanity it behooves us all to listen to those experts who understand the deeper functions of the brain. This includes the likes of Peter Breggin , Len Ber and others who have stepped forward bravely, like your good self.
A recent interview that Len Ber MD conducted with another good doctor was explaining the real purpose behind the "Brain Fog" that so many are noticing. Apparently its for A.I. to be able to keep up with the processes within the brain. This makes logical sense to me as a layman and helps explain the necessity of all the intentional neurological damage being done today.
Just another wee piece of this massive jigsaw puzzle.
Thank You stepping up, as so few do for us all, Sir.
A thorough and compelling exposition of our current dilemma.
It has been noted through the ages that there is a gulf between the domains of knowledge and wisdom, with the later often in short supply. We need the insights of metaphysics to balance out the materialist equation, but the present popular zeitgeist leaves little room for the exploration and understanding of those mysteries. Our species approaches a self-generated great reckoning, and the outcome is simply unknowable at this point. It's all exhausting. The curse of Exciting Times?
Again you summarize beautifully and leave room for conversation.
I would like to present a possible starting point for an answer to your questions. It’s taken me a lifetime of searching to discover and refine my position of understanding so I apologize for the lengthy response. I haven’t published anything yet and my objective is to be relevant so I may leave room for further discussion.
From every perspective I think there is a need to be assured that the foundation of science and the extension into society is firm and trustworthy. Science and mathematics have recently become more important than music , art, literature and religious thought. In effect they have formed their own religion, one that does not allow the foundation to be questioned. I personally believe that all the educational disciplines form the foundation of understanding together and have discovered something disruptive and disturbing to present .
For most of us life is primarily experienced through our eyes, and as you have pointed out that is where the disbelief in the IOT rests, in the apparent invisibility of the nanoscale phenomenon. Frequency, radiation, energy these are all the things that tie the fore mentioned disciplines together.
At this point some may dismiss what I am about to write because it opens up the religious creation account as part of a valid reasonable discussion. The Bible says that God is light and that He alone holds all things together and since light is comprised of frequency, radiation, energy I logically assert that we need to be certain of how we understand light and how we measure it because by extension our understanding of light comprises everything we know visibly .
I am not proposing that biblical text answers all questions in science or should be viewed as a scientific text, far from it. I believe that science and biblical text don’t have to disagree at all and am very concerned that we don’t have rational explorations and discussion in this matter as a part of higher learning.
While searching for a rational explanation of how it might be possible for ancient biblical text and modern scientific studies to actually agree I discovered that censorship and deception has occurred in the standardization of the speed of light measurement. This information shakes the foundations of how we understand almost everything in the scientific literature.
Until the 1980’s it was common for light speed tests to be conducted and recorded in various methods and by many scientists, but as the desire for consensus and the furtherance of funding into institutions demanded a certainty of outcomes , the decision was made to standardize the speed of light and deny any further publication that might question the accuracy of data related to light speed.
Here is the problem, although it appeared by selecting only the most recent light speed experiments that the speed of light is a constant standard, looking at the whole of the tests and published results that is not accurate and since we only have a few hundred years of testing data to work with it is dangerously presumptive to establish a foundation on narrowly selected data. Most people would not believe this happens in science except that we have been seeing it far too often with the corona and climate narratives. The few scientists who have tried to open the conversation have been censored and ignored - sound familiar?
Rupert Sheldrake did a Ted talk and it was removed from the archives, I discovered a very detailed explanation beginning in 1984 by Australian scientist Barry Setterfield. He has continued to refine the arguments and data looking to reconcile the published statistical evidence for over 20 years. Not enough intelligent minds are currently looking for evidence and no funding is ever coming from godless wealthy elites because I believe they are seeking knowledge on how to avoid the certainty of death and judgement described in the Bible. No I don’t want to get into a persecution complex by saying this, although it’s a very provable fact that believers in Christ have been and still are the most persecuted of all beliefs globally.
So here is how I understand the scientific evidence, and it has become the single most important evidence that I consider scientifically to be of the source driving the tyrannical oppression and exploitative experiments that we are continuing to experience.
The speed light in relation to other known laws of physics is indeed slowing down, although the ability to measure this effect has required measurements of smaller and smaller amounts based on the published data it has an appearing exponential rate of slowing. This does not change everything we know in science, but it does impact greatly scientific dating in archaeology, radioactive isotope analysis, and the established age of celestial bodies. The yet undebated theory proposes that a sort of big explosion origin occurred and matter began moving away from a central point very rapidly, so rapidly in fact that it would only have taken thousands of years or so for the furthest star to reach its current location. Celestial bodies continue to move out in expansion as we continue to say the universe is expanding, this is an observed fact today, but maybe not as rapidly as it began.
Geological evidence dating would need a much larger amount of uncertainty in measurements and the fossil record would need to be completely altered, millions or billions could be thousand of years instead.
Currently many inconvenient studies are discarded for more than a century, scientists who perform them are not supported and published because they don’t agree with scientific consensus and I think if we really are curious and open minded to allow inquiries about truth the consensus will continue to unravel.
For my entire life I’ve had to listen to experts tell me I am just plain wrong and ignorant to believe the things written in the Bible , and if you’re still reading this and have not rejected my position yet, please consider it worth some time to investigate. There are a lot of fact checkers out there who have written that light speed is not slowing down and you may have to avoid google as a search engine, but if you need help finding the studies I will gladly share a few links. However I did not just add a bunch of links because I think that this inquiry needs to be sincere, comments and questions are as always welcome, if you have evidence that I should consider share it as well. I am not an expert with letters behind my name , but I can read and understand well enough to engage in civil debate on almost any issue.
Here's an interesting video with an interview with Heinz von Foerester explaining that things changed from science to "systemics".
The Internet of Bodies, hooked up to the cloud and controlled like the comuter game, The Sims, is where we are heading. The plandemic was to put enough fear into everyone to roll up their sleeves. The WHO has declared 2020 as the decade of vaccines. Of course, they need to get the children from birth and want all vaccines changed to this platform. It's of no consequence to them about injuries and deaths as they experiment with ingredients and doses - just acceptable collateral damage whilst perfecting technique. Governments are selling the idea that our bodies can be monitored by sensors and AI used to detect anomalies before any physical symptoms manifest and solutions brought to body to correct it. It all sounds so wonderful, doesn't?
What is the actual human benefit -- or harm -- of the current "wonders" of math and science?
Biden signs executive order designed to unleash transhumanist hell on America and the world: 2022
“We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers…including through computing tools and artificial intelligence…“
Take a trip outside the confines of mainstream science:
"Imagine how the world will change when humanity realizes it's interconnectedness with all life"
Great article, Doc! And great question to end with.
Medical science would be better off if medical doctors left statistics to scientists.
Very absorbing essay! From my journal (and I can only hope this has something to do with what you were getting at, but it's what the essay elicited from me):
Thought for the day: science, as I see it (and I suppose I could be wrong) works under the assumption that there exists a determinate reality (determinate here meaning: ordered and therefore predictable), apart from our perceptions and categorizations of it, or language about it, that is intelligible to the conscious human mind even if we have to use perceptions, language, and categorizations to describe it to ourselves. Those who do not believe this at some level, aren’t motivated to “do” science. That said, even if you are not a Christian, is it even possible to look at the state of current industrial (post-industrial?) civilization, with its structural features in addition to its history of grabs for power by specific sociopathic individuals, and not get the impression that something is deeply wrong with human nature itself, something very fundamental, something that has thrown us significantly out of alignment with the rest of the determinacy that is reality (which therefore appears alien and hostile to us if we’re fully honest about it)? Something about us that we can’t simply “fix” by ourselves by formulating the right psychological or sociological theories and applications, any more than we can “fix” industrial civilization by voting “the right people” into power?
Hi Emanuel. I am a kind of polyglot who likes to have knowledge and comprehension of all things. A lot of answers come down to asking the right question. I have a discovery that is in your area of expertise that I would like to ask you about. I have found a way to use exogenous hormones to replicate the benefits of using young blood to gain rejuvenation and regeneration, without the need to use any blood. This is a totally new idea, and your knowledge and openminded views might help me identify the best use for this discovery. I do have some ideas, but this is a new way of understanding hormone activity that doctors dont currently have, and is not conventional understanding. I hope you are interested enough to reply. It is not quite the meaning of life, but it does give some insights into the nature of aging and longevity.
"Who’s running this show? And, ultimately, to what purpose?"
been thinking about this a lot more than usual lately. i put up something like this on amy sukwan's board - maybe nobody is running the show. maybe it's a bot
maybe the cabal are so effete and out of touch that they would entrust their warmaking to a GIGO machine?
i look at the DEW destruction on maui and see a very surgical strike, but one with consistent errors, like a machine would make. the untouched blue umbrellas and roofs for example. atomic bomb level destruction without the fallout. could happen anywhere.
why? catherine austin fitts and alison mcdowell have unpacked this more articulately than i can. basically, the paper assets bubble is about to burst, the cabal want to seize hard assets and do their gambling on us with social credit scores and human capital bonds.
we know how 90% of technology was either designed specifically for warfare or is warfare-adjacent. since the beginning of the human species, our path to discovery IMO has been brain-centric and not holistic (we have cognitive cells in the heart, digestive tract and reproductive system for example). until we move toward a more heart-centric and spiritual system of discovery and what to do with those discoveries, we are in for a rough road
Here’s a model for a better future: www.nottwoispeace.org/com