Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Interesting to find that exemptions were possible for Education staff under section 12a. I was a school bus driver employed by my local rural school. I decided not to be jabbed. Subsequent attempts at sane discussions were always met with glazed looks and a fervour to change the subject. I foresaw the brainwashing bullshit that was about to be unleashed on our tamariki, and when the mandate happened I resigned. I now have another job involving young people, and though the financial impact of the mandate has been mitigated, my enduring loss is the shattered relationship I had with the 50 kids on my bus, and the loss of trust that pervades every interaction I have with government employees - including my former friends on school staff. I hope your light shines. "You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free" - John 8:32

Expand full comment

beautiful commentary, this whole scandal is so despicable, and these smug criminals who destroyed so many lives will have their day in court or, at least, at the pearly gates ... Thank you for your words and stay strong.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

You are a strong person with integrity and courage. People often think bus drivers just drive the bus but that is not so. My son has an amazing bus driver that knows every child really well and puts his whole self into those children's well being and honestly cares. I value that bus driver greatly. Everyday I trust him to get my child 30 km to school and 30 km home again and every day I thank him as Charlie gets on and off the bus because I know he cares. A wonderful man and hugely appreciated. You sound like a similar man. Please know mothers notice these things. With love.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

It is criminal, not being jabbed themselves but telling their patients to take the jab. Not being a whistle-blower and let their colleagues speak out and losing their licenses, what kind of colleagues are they? And as a patient you constantly ask yourself seeing a doctor are you bloody one of those creeps.

Expand full comment

you've nailed it ... in fact, I never want to see a doctor again if I can help it. What creeps indeed. Thank you for commenting!

Expand full comment

I have become quite unwell through this as I am unjabbed but have made a determination not to see any of the doctors I have recourse to. I do not trust them in the slightest and never experienced anything but gasloghting and obfuscation.

Expand full comment

‘Exemptions’ shouldn’t exist…

People are supposed to be giving voluntary informed consent to medical interventions, including vaccination, or declining the intervention if they so choose…so how can there be exemptions to NOT have a medical intervention?

I’m raising this matter with the Health Minister in Australia, Mark Butler, please see my email below - this is a matter I’m pursuing…

Mark Butler, I’ve been advised by the Department of Health and Aged Care that:

"Informed consent should be obtained for every COVID-19 vaccination, as per usual consent procedures for other vaccinations."

As health practitioners are legally and ethically obligated to obtain voluntary informed consent before every COVID-19 vaccination, why should anyone have to obtain a COVID-19 exemption to not have a COVID-19 vaccination?

Who are the individual medical practitioners behind this Department of Health COVID-19 Vaccine exemptions information, which completely flouts the legal and ethical obligation for voluntary informed consent?

The Australian Immunisation Handbook states:

"Valid consent is the voluntary agreement by an individual to a proposed procedure, which is given after sufficient, appropriate and reliable information about the procedure, including the potential risks and benefits, has been conveyed to that individual."

As stated by the Australian Law Reform Commission, under common law:

"As part of their duty of care, health professionals must obtain 'informed consent' by providing such information as is necessary for the patient to give consent to treatment, including information on all material risks of the proposed treatment..."

The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare Fact Sheet for Clinicians on Informed consent in health care acknowledges key principles for informed consent, including:

"...adults have the right to determine what will be done to their bodies and what healthcare treatments they will undergo."


"For there to be valid informed consent, the person consenting must... Have enough information about their condition, treatment options, the benefits and risks relevant to them, and alternative options for them to make an informed decision to consent. This includes the opportunity to ask questions and discuss concerns."

Again quoting the Australian Law Reform Commission: "At common law, all competent adults can consent to and refuse medical treatment. If consent is not established, there may be legal consequences for health professionals".

Mark Butler, why should anyone have to obtain an exemption to not have a vaccination, given that they are supposed to be voluntarily giving their informed consent to this medical intervention, which may also include their choice to not have the intervention.

I look forward to your response on this matter, including disclosure of the identity of the individual medical practitioners behind the Department of Health COVID-19 Vaccine exemptions information.


Elizabeth Hart

Independent researcher investigating vaccine products and conflicts of interest in vaccination policy


Original email accessible via this link:

'Exemptions’ for Covid-19 vaccinations directly contradicts voluntary informed



Expand full comment
Oct 6, 2023·edited Oct 6, 2023Author

You couldn't be more correct. "Exemptions" are an abomination because they imply the legitimacy of the rule of force. Thank you.

Expand full comment

A lot more emails with an Australian perspective accessible on my website, suggest also relevant to you in New Zealand, see this link: https://vaccinationispolitical.net/vax-australia/

For instance, have a very careful read of this email thread…

Mandatory Covid-19 vaccination - Why did CMO Paul Kelly capitulate to Scott

Morrison and National Cabinet's demand for mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for

residential aged care workers?


Expand full comment

Thank you very much!

Expand full comment

You are a legend Elizabeth Hart , clear on the facts in issue. Clear who owns the responsibility for them, thank you for enormous effort. This information makes a mockery of what is called a health issue, health issue, no, an enforcement issue by corporate entities , no exemptions, and all the protocols of informed consent obfuscated to political expediency, abandonment of the

Black Triangle protocols of an Experimental Countermeasure, which adds to the informed consent, Experimental as announced by the then Health Minister Hunt, who claimed that we were involved in the biggest experiment in the World. Reading the NHS (GB) requirements for

the information relative to the Black Triangle, is Consent to you participating in an experimental

Medical Trial, it takes 40 minutes to explain the process, well , the production line of " in arms not worry about the harms" attitude, and a caveat of exemption to the law, as all the means of

the right of lawful redress removed , now we see, not for some, this is an outrage, this exemptions scam reduces the Medical Practitioners standing to the depths, Silence is Consent.

Thank you Elizabeth Hart, and God Bless You.

Expand full comment
Oct 8, 2023·edited Oct 8, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Thanks for your support John.

This is an absolute disaster area...the area of 'voluntary informed consent / valid consent' for vaccination...

It seems to me no-one is giving authentic voluntary informed consent for vaccination, any vaccination, because no-one is ever properly informed, and many people are coerced, and even mandated into this medical intervention.

The situation is extremely serious in Australia, considering for example the coercing/mandating of people to submit to Covid-19 vaccination to maintain their livelihoods and participate in civil society during the height of the Covid madness.

In this regard, I'd appreciate your thoughts on my recent email thread to Australian Chief Medical Officer Paul Kelly. As I said, this is very serious, as it seems the former Prime Minister Scott Morrison and National Cabinet overruled Paul Kelly and the AHPPC's advice against compulsory vaccination for residential aged care workers, and thereby precipitated the spread of mandatory Covid-19 vaccination in Australia.

Have a good think about this email thread:

Mandatory Covid-19 vaccination - Why did CMO Paul Kelly capitulate to Scott Morrison and National Cabinet's demand for mandatory Covid-19 vaccination for residential aged care workers?


Expand full comment

Your work on this is very though indeed, and you have certainly invested a great deal into it. I see your evidence is chronological and supported by the public record of

events, your references are provided and are accurate.

I have read your emails to the CMO Kelly and your questions to him, which in the light

of his Office he must deal with.

Unfortunately, in the matters we have all lived through, and the conduct of the powers

who should know better, do not stand by the Law, despite what was said in the interview, they do not. They forget that it exists, and hope you don't know about it.

If based on the judgement of reasonable people, who when presented with the facts

in issue and the evidence of actual ' Science ' as was the case in Great Britain,

Chris Witty Medical Officer, stated that this situation was not an issue as he did not

believe the disease was serious enough, my , my the tune was soon changed.


utm_source=substack&utm_ campaign =post_embed&utm_medium=email

The following is my summation,

A dear friend and myself have since this began assembled a vast document resource,

Thousands of documents, directories, downloads, manufacturers reports,

All the Pfizer early Trial Documents , Moderna , the Chinese Manufacturers, all the

links to who did what , the subsidiary manufacturers of chemicals for the countermeasures. and the warnings of the toxic nature of the materials, SM 102

comes to mind, Not fit for Human or Veterinary use, Lab only.

No trial on pregnant or lactating mothers, information unknown or incomplete.

Then there are the laws 2015 was a big year for the World and these laws ,

UN Global Preparedness Initiatives,? 43 Countries, Bio- Security legislation,


Morrison is a Goat, a bully boy, and a political animal, yet in this he is just an

instrument. He along with others were Tasked, from the Governor-General all the

Military Leaders, and then the closed shop of the State and Cabinet control box.

Where Morrison and the Cabinet ghouls over took the Constitution, and the rule of law.

I am saying this to bring an appreciation of how " BIG" this really is , I think you

understand this.

The Coordination of this operation, the uniformity of actions and responses, the distribution of resources, from media, law enforcement agencies, medical

collusion, the Courts and Religious institutions , Local Councils, and most

Importantly and the most forgotten tier of Government actuaries, the Corporate

Monolith, who were the servers and conveyers of Government policy acting as

agencies of social an community enforcement,

Enter Kelly and his ilk of Acronyms, AHPRA, and the professional political Doctors,

Do you think under the weight of what was put in place , they are redundant, just like

Informed Consent, Privacy , Decency , Honour of Oath , redundant, like the maxims of

Common Law, redundant, because where do the honest people go, where would

Kelly go, in his heart of hearts , he knows the feeble Brendan Murphy, he knows,

and the show goes on, and this is a Big Show, and the Stakes are High.

Our lives.

I , like you and many others will fight on, but I have an intimate understanding of

what and who the enemy is.

What you have done, and what you have put out there is eminently honourable and

passionate, what New Zealand Doc and Liz Lambert and Sue Greys are doing is

picking away to expose what is behind the viel, piece by piece, it comes to us.

We have to,understand the play on words , the bluff, the heavy hand are all cards

played by the deceivers the con- artists , who are trying to take your power away

from you, emotionally blackmail and intimidate , coerce your livelihood, anxiety and tribulation, all this for your health and saving your life , No.

All the secrets , the violent thuggery , the isolation and destruction and despair,

this was the disease they created, and creeps like Morrison , forced it on us.

Forced , nobody was forced, ah yes , those clever words, remember it's your fault.

I see that support for the Governments in Office, elected by the fearful and the

quivering who fell for the protection racket of hard line policies, is falling .

Keep up the good work mate.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Useful idiots such as Ardern, Hipkins and Bloomflakes, could well be thrown under the bus by their puppet masters ...

Expand full comment

I suspect they will, I hope they will. They are rank criminals.

Expand full comment

I can see the tax payer being hit some more paying for all the various compensations, should the court cases succeed. On top of the unpayable debt caused by the plandemic.

We cannot afford to pay for all the job losses, business failures, deaths, physical and mental injuries.

The governmental workers will have liability insurance aspects to their contracts so they cannot be sued. Pfizer got themselves a no blame contract.

The dame and the sir are apparently not to be harassed now that they are scot-free in pastures new.

The only sort of victory I can see is having more people wake up and recognise that who they thought were heroes were actually murderers and destroyers of society and the social contract.

Expand full comment

"Useful idiots" is a term applicable to the people who carried out the orders of Adern, Bloomfield and others. They are criminally culpable in every way.

Expand full comment

I don't know that Bloomfield is a useful idiot, his brazen lies about NZ's "best in the world" response - useful yes, idiot no

Expand full comment

I'll stick by my statement, he's an idiot if he thinks he will get away with what he has done.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

Why these health workers?

Liz says that it depended on what political party they were affiliated with. That would explain why so few actual applications but that these applications covered whole groups. They were groups of party members.

Then why not also cohorts from other professions.

Lots of conjecture possible, like maybe it's healthcare workers who were necessary for the injections rollout. The presumed gag orders as part of the exemptions kept a compliant force of injectors, and the selection of loyal political party members kept it a closed club.

Expand full comment

interesting questions ... did those who were exempt promote the jabs nonetheless? Or did they work stealthily against it? Who exactly were they -- how many doctors? How many silent complicit doctors? Thank you for commenting.

Expand full comment

I would put money on it that the other additional 6k plus were the CEOs and executive hierarchy of the corporate partners!

Expand full comment
deletedOct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Obedience training aka education.

Interestingly homeschooling is illegal (other than for health type reasons) in Germany; wonder why that is.

Expand full comment
Oct 5, 2023·edited Oct 5, 2023Liked by NewZealandDoc

how can they sleep at night?

Expand full comment

I really don't know ...

Expand full comment

As a mother of a child who was exposed to high levels of super phosphate and the associated chemicals and who was diagnosed with Autism weeks prior to receiving cominarty without any adverse reaction information being communicated nor in writing as per the disabilities code for administration of experimental medicaments. I applied for exemptions both prior to the first administration and second administrations of comirnaty which his father took him for whilst we were in family court proceedings which I expressed my guardianship non-consent in writing to, on both occasions that I did not, and would not, grant guardianship consent until this information was known first on the premise that without knowing the baseline of health, when child was presenting with a plethora of health issues involving a list of over 30 presentations including cardiac, respiratory and neurological issues and there were no interactive studies for those exposed to agri-chemicals in a country whose GDP is based on them. I watched my then 12 year old son bleed 1/2c of nose bleeds, have dizzy spells, chest pains, have difficulty breathing etc. in the 48hrs after receiving the second "dose". The primary concern is that in a WHO study all kiwi children tested exceeded the recommended weekly intake of cadmium, that's children who didn't spend their formative years of development as a downwind neighbour of a fertiliser depot, so it was highly likely that our son would be exposed to a higher degree of cadmium, arsenic, lead, mercury and acidity than most. His blood samples showed cadmium in his blood. My concern, expressed in writing to all responsible from father, GP to Chris Hipkins in not providing an exemption from the vx was that there was a high likelihood in systems exposed to the vx with pre-exisiting carcinogens, that should the vx degrade the mitochondrial membrane the carcinogens have unimpeded access to the chromosomes. The forecast risk of harm being an increased chromosomal exposure to carcinogenic matter and thus accelerated development of cancer/s. There are several plants and over 400 fertiliser depots in NZ and most of these are surrounded by residential and vulnerable peoples. There are no words to describe how I feel finding out that some professionals were receiving exemptions yet one was not granted to us. None the less, thank you for presenting the information.

Expand full comment

my heart goes out to you for your travails ... these people are truly despicable, in every way. I am so sorry to hear what you went through.

Expand full comment

Thank you. May you and yours be blessed with good health

Expand full comment

Thank you so much!

Expand full comment

Hi John, you say "Then there are the laws 2015 was a big year for the World and these laws..."

Indeed, 2015 was a significant year...

That's when the Australian Biosecurity Act was put in place in Australia. https://www.legislation.gov.au/Series/C2015A00061

I looked at this in 2020 in regard to vaccination - see what I found in this BMJ rapid response: Five years imprisonment and/or a $66,600 fine for refusing coronavirus vaccination? 30 October 2020: https://www.bmj.com/content/370/bmj.m3258/rr-17

In the end they didn't go this route for coercive vaccination, much of the mandates were implemented via the states and employers, led by Paul Kelly and the AHPPC's initial mandates, as you've read in my email to Paul Kelly.

In 2013-2015 the Murdoch media lobbied for coercive vaccination for children, i.e. incentivised with financial benefits - it was the No Jab, No Play campaign, which became the No Jab, No Pay law in 2016. Scott Morrison was involved in this - he was Social Services Minister in 2015 and raised the No Jab, No Pay bill. As you know, subsequently, the No Jab concept came into its own in Covid times - No Jab, No Job...to...No Jab, No Life...

For more background on this matter, see my email to then Prime Minister Scott Morrison: No Jab, No Pay/No Play - coercive coronavirus vaccination in Australia - PM Scott Morrison and the Murdoch Media, 18 February 2021: https://vaccinationispolitical.files.wordpress.com/2021/02/no-jab-no-pay-no-play-coercive-vaccination-in-australia.pdf

Expand full comment

And what do you think about this…?

Another study says…

New Zealand Covid response saved 20,000 lives, study says | New Zealand | The Guardian


Expand full comment

It's what one expects from an organ of propaganda: lies.

Expand full comment

Here’s another one…this stuff has to be called out…

Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study - The Lancet Infectious Diseases


Expand full comment


Schmidt Science Fellowship in partnership with the Rhodes Trust; WHO; UK Medical Research Council; Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance; Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation; National Institute for Health Research; and Community Jameel."

That should be enough to reject it out of hand.

Anyway, since when have mathematical modelling studies been of any use.


Expand full comment

Meaningless drivel from the Guardian. Still, they are mainly just reporting the drivel from Michael Baker and Siouxsie Wiles.

"The 20,000 lives the report claims were spared is based on what New Zealand would have experienced if it had a similar Covid mortality rate to the US, where well over a million people have died so far, said Baker."

So what Michael?

As for Siouxsie Wiles, her name includes the word 'useless'.

Expand full comment

WOW, wonderful news, thank you for sharing

Expand full comment