Most won't do anything until it's on TV or Stuff/NZ Herald. Yes they hav their suspicions but want them confirmed by the same sources that fooled them in the first place. Safety in numbers. Numbers they aligned with and know well.
Exactly. I think the best way is to lead by example. When I say that I mean just be happy, positive and healthy, as well as uninjected of course. That in itself speaks volumes and sows a seed on fertile ground for questions to be asked. That may, like ripples in a pond, spread ever outwards.
I feel it's always better to show and be asked than bludgeon people with our own sense of 'being right'. Nobody likes that in their face, do they.
The degree and intensity of buy-in to the narrative within the medical profession has to be seen to be believed, never mind the general public and the ‘intelligentsia’.
Some quotes I've collected that explain the craziness of the situation...
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
"The evolutionary psychologist William von Hippel found that humans use large parts of thinking power to navigate social world rather than perform independent analysis and decision making. For most people it is the mechanism that, in case of doubt, will prevent one from thinking what is right if, in return, it endangers one’s social status. This phenomenon occurs more strongly the higher a person’s social status. Another factor is that the more educated and more theoretically intelligent a person is, the more their brain is adept at selling them the biggest nonsense as a reasonable idea, as long as it elevates their social status. The upper educated class tends to be more inclined than ordinary people to chase some intellectual boondoggle. "
"I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face."
Yes. And I think it was done for that precise purpose too. Because no modern westerner will get down on their knees and beg for divine forgiveness/guidance/succour etc. unless they are staring death in the face. (Passionate christians notwithstanding.)
There's a relatively recent child's film called 'Puss'n'Boots, the Last Wish'.
Death (played by Fenrir?) stalks the cat with nine lives, and the cat runs, begs, hides etc. until he finally faces death like a real man.
(9 is the number of consciousness.)
There are a million ways to kill vast swathes of humanity outright. Flick of a switch, but this is so much more than that. An exemplary operation down to names, codes, everything has meaning right across the board, even the recent Titan sub.,- it's dazzling if one can get past the terrestrial horrors.
I'd finish the next two parts of a three part description of what I'm trying to say on my own jolly page if I can ever stop commenting on other peoples Substacks...
And about this name, 'Sub stack.' What does one stack? One FILES papers. One stacks logs. For the fire? I was wondering if we are laying the base layer of wood for the inferno of consciousness/truth which might occur when the masses finally click maybe soon, but no later than 2030/2031.
There's a neat couple of lines, the first and last two from a poem by Emily Dickinson which goes;
I refuse to give up hope, and I share your idea that telling everyone about more deaths has no positive effect. If I could find good information about counteracting the bad effects of the jabs, i would share that. I am reading as much as i can about detox. I have shared some of that information.
Simmering OG citrus rinds on low heat for 20 min., drinking that when cooled; as good as any pill of vit C or if pills not available. Also, Burdock root tea daily (add milk and honey if you like) got me through a 'mystery' illness I had way back in Nov. of 2019. Burdock has among many other things, quercitin and inulin, which keeps your blood sugar up if you cannot eat. That happens as the mystery illness was very wasting, just like radiation poisoning can be.
In 2007 I ran against Gavin for mayor of SF killafornia. I lost my business and went to jail, thank you ScKamala.
I said folks ought to be able to live in commercial spaces. 2007.
Now we have literally people sleeping on the sidewalk or worse everywhere in SF or pushed out, and the commercial vacancies are possibly fifty percent, because COVID, democracy, and greed.
But I gave up long ago saying it ought to be legal to live in commercial...
I am struggling to work and live day by day, and like the initial protests against the Harmacide scamdemic injextions and mask mandates and lockdown, all that went away, as well as my will to stay in this shitty, which destroys itself apace.
You have been a hero and, unfortunately like most real heroes, you have paid for it. I send my very best wishes. I remember SF as a lovely humming city not so very long ago ... and now?
Hang in there, my good thoughts and wishes are with you.
I've largely given up on trying to convinced the jabbed of their folly in taking an experimental mrna substance into their bodies which may lead to horrific long term illnesses, gross disabilities and ghastly premature deaths. I accept that their pride makes them defensive, sometimes violently so.
Also that the thought of these utterly humungous potential dark and deadly consequences are simply too much for them to contemplate. I suspect many of them in the quiet, private, small hours of the night, and in their dreamings get glimpses of thus reality and subconsciously diversionary themselves in shopping, drinking, mindless media and myriad other distractions.
Of course this produces a psychically numbing. A kind of living torpor. Such is the price of living in massive denial.
As a former psychotherapist I know I could point our their gestalt, at leasr bit by bit and working hard to break through layers if defensiveness, with a few at least but choose not to.
So, I go about my days consciously being as warm, friendly and open as social circumstances allow. The air I'm trying to exude in doing so is one of great health, vitality and confidence. In a word charisma of a sort, and when the previous moment arrives, like you, courageously in the Malaysian eatery, I do my best to become a one man nudge Unit.
I find it's hard emotional and spiritual work as I simultaneously accept that my darkest imaginings about the terrible possible outcomes for many of these poor lost folks may actually come to pass. It's a strange, new place for me to be in psychologically, and yet like anything practiced regularly is gradually strengthening. I wish life weren't so, but there it is. Soldiering on.
Thank you very much for your observations on this terrible mess and its emotional toil on you and other sensible dedicated people. Sadly enough, the darkest imaginings are being realised .... Hang in there!
Thanks for this. I observe this also, that trying to talk to friends, family, and colleagues doesn't help, they only dig in deeper, and it generates a rift. At the same time, I have transcribed many testimonies from the jab injured and it really strikes me, every time, how many of them were enthusiastic about getting jabbed, but once injured, gaslighted, and sometimes even shamed, they did a 180, and fast.
Here's an example of that:
*******************
Suzanna Newell: "My Whole Life Changed in 30 Hours"
"My case isn't unique. There are tens of thousands of us."
This is not so for all of the testimonies I have transcribed. Some didn't want the jab, but they played Russian roulette to keep a job, go to school, or be able to see family members, and now they haven't changed their minds, they're just more angry now.
*******************
Fabien Stocco, Pericarditis by Pfizer: "I'm freaking pissed right now"
"I didn't want to get this vaccine...And now I have pericarditis and I'm not able to go do my job."
But again, I observe that under some conditions, some people do change their minds wholly, and very fast. I think the RFK campaign is betting on that-- I actually think, if RFK can achieve a tipping point, he can take the Democratic Party. I'm watching with great interest.
Relatedly, what's also very peculiar to me is that of the covidians I know (multi-jabbed, all in with punishing the unvaxxed), if you'd asked them in 2019 what they thought about segregating people, and mandating experimental gene therapy, vaccines so called, on people at little to no risk of dying of a disease, they would have been horrified, and said, of course, never. So from 2019 to 2021, many minds did a 180 on many things.
you are doing immensely important work for the historical record (predicated upon whether we have a future of course ....). I think RFK Jr will awaken many but he won't be allowed to get the DNC nomination. Thank you for your excellent commentary.
It is interesting that the public response has led me to the same approach that you have taken. I'll talk with someone who is interested, but I will no longer argue against a mass delusion.
As part of copywriting, I had to understand persuasion theory. As almost everyone knows, persuasion theory, at its most fundamental level, tells the "seller" of an idea to understand a person's objections and then overcome them. I've never liked that approach because the person who is the subject of persuasion can instinctively detect that the "convincer" is somehow dependent on the decision that will be made and that sets up a power dynamic that I don't like very much. Sadly, the same happens even when I argue, not for personal gain, but because I care about the person to whom I am speaking. They think (and have often told me) that I must need them for validation of my own ideas, or they suppose that I gain some reward if I am able to change their mind. I think the vaxxers sense that anti-vaxxers are trying to build public momentum, which means we need them. But I don't need them. I care about them, but the outcomes in my life are not tied to the decisions they make. So when people impute false, selfish motives to me, I stop.
When I feel compelled to advance an idea, I prefer the approach of a rather unique individual who disregarded traditional persuasion theory and said the better thing to do is to state the truth in a rather deadpan manner and say - here it is, if you want it fine, if not, I don't care. That pulls the plug on the one-upmanship that characterizes those who take the majority, publicly supported, but incorrect position on any topic. I have also noticed that once I say I don't care what they do, it actually increases the credibility of what I say. That doesn't change their response, but it gets rid of the annoying nose-in-the-air effect.
I start out with concern for others, but there is a limit. They have free will, and the right to exercise it, and I am not going to get drawn into the tragedy of their world, where I have no influence or control of outcomes.
Where I have genuine difficulty is in speaking with someone who has been harmed, or potentially harmed by the vaccines, and could be helped, but would have to understand that the spike might be behind their injury. In this instance, the offer of help is intertwined with the pain of knowing the cause, and I feel an obligation to say something, because their health is at stake. It is a similar situation with those who have been vaccinated a few times and are considering what to do now. I'll admit, I lie. I tell them it's like a parabola, and that even if they got a benefit from the first few shots, the benefit can wear off and you would need more and more and more - like heroine. This is the only way I have found to avoid inflicting the pain of the truth of the shots they took, while trying to help them make the right decision about futures shots. It is an imperfect world. I have an imperfect solution. What do you do when part of the truth is "you have caused pain for yourself." I can't bring myself to do that to others when I cannot eliminate all the ill consequences for them, even under the best of circumstances.
Thank you so much for your very rich commentary and taking the time to share this with us. We are in a very challenging position ... recently a relative of a relative had a heart attack at the age of 39. No questioning of the possible catalysis by the jab (he's had at least four by the way.
I'm in UK, was a "normie" until Aug/Sept 2020 when I accidentally discovered the PCR "test" was based on computer sequences, not the actual alleged virus and noticed how more testing produced more "cases" rather than more ill people. I also discovered all the alternative video platforms, certain websites and, of course, substack. I tried to warn friends and family of the distasters of previous attempts using mRNA in animal subjects also. Alas, I failed to prevent anyone to get them. Most just wanted their lives back, to work, socialise, travel, some frightened so much because of their normal bad health who now have had 5 or even 6 of these bioweapons! What most medical people look at is just the medical side but I think if the lockdowns, masking, social distancing along with how doctors were prevented from treating patients in the normal way, they should see how politicised this was globally and more to do with another banking crises and funnelling of money to support these banks, yet again. Now we have moved to a war and energy crises and the big push on global warming. The WHO and UN are globalist predators with their IHR, Pandemic Treaty and zero CO2 goals. I think unless people move away from listening only to mainstream news and reading the mainstream papers, they will remain hoodwinked.
I think you are absolutely correct... you have described a clear-thinking trajectory of discovery and the dots all connect. Thank you so much for sharing this.
Thanks for your insights and to all those who have made the effort to enlighten those that knew something did not add up as we did not have the understanding and information to support our gut feelings. This has been a time of great learning and a reevaluation of everything we thought we knew. Interacting with close family and friends who are proud and virtuous about their collection of boosters is not a joy but a shrinking of our heart as any effort to nudge or explain is a thankless pointless task for now. To be enriched by so much knowledge and insights can never be uplifting when the majority wallow in their received ignorance, they are the anchor that prevents humanity advancing to where we must reach.
Time and small steps for now; the churning will have a result, let’s hope for humanity it is not the dark ages but a new age. For now to inform ourselves seems the only option, to be creative the spark that is missing in this joyless trance they are keeping the majority addicted too.
You put it so very well ... we are challenged immensely by ignorance around us, by familial rifts, etc. Thank you so much for taking the time to comment and share your observations.
When I went through my 'cogdis' about this, I went literally crazy for about a day. It was when they threatened, and then really started, to jab the little ones. So as the few of the jabbed wake to this genocide, I fully expect them to also go crazy, at least momentarily. It represents an upending of our core trust in others as fellow humans, and it should not be an easy realization. Also, re your words, 'They bought the materialist ideal, they’ve flaunted their numbers in the complex rat race they’ve accepted, and they’ve got nothing to look forward to except more money, more stuff and more life, even if that life is increasingly hemmed in by their authorities.', I have to add that many of them are now dead, from the jabs, and it doesn't get more hemmed in than that. The walking dead, decades of untimely funerals to attend. I do what I can to stay sane, thank you for the assistance Dr. G.
G'day NZD, I used to try & have a go at giving a "heads up" to the poor dudded ( deluded )but it appears to me that some, not all, think they've made a smart choice & the other side, i.e. the thinkers, are complete morons ( happy to be one). That's the some, the not all just don't want to know imo, (cue fingers in the ears & la,la,la,) they are a bit like the punter who brags about their winners but NEVER about their loser's or that they may have been sold a pup, or that have been totally duped, therefore they look like an complete & utter dill(s) but in their favour & nearly always on the quiet, they make a sensible decision to NEVER take another dose of the poison. Of course I could be wrong, doubt it.
Here is one suggestion that may alter our discourse and understanding. Rather than referring to it as the Main Stream Media (MSM). Perhaps we should refer to it as the Organized Media (OM), with or without capitalization.
It does contain undertones of Organized Jewry, but this is incidental rather than deliberate and may be appropriate in any case.
Edit: The idea of course suggests that this branch of media is organized and not organic and that there is some purpose behind what is published and that it may or may not be factual.
I can live with not being able to convince/warn adult friends and family about the lies they're being told by msm(edia) and authorities but when it comes to their children and pets, I get very distressed to see the harm being inflicted by their well meaning but sleepy caregivers.
I think a firm belief in the government probably points to an inability to sit with cognitive dissonance. It also holds a lack of curiosity, and maybe an idea that truth is a relative concept.
Holding here and now comfort above a need to get to the bottom of things has a dubious reward. Those people will fall victim to side effects. I so want to help, but right, we have to keep cool and mete out the facts to those who show some interest.
So many have their doubts but don't want to know.
Don't want any details.
And they're suspicious.
But unwilling to prove themselves deceived.
Rather not speak about it.
Rather not worry about something they can't undo.
Rather take the most convenient path.
The path of least discomfort.
And so just feign ignorance.
But every once and a while I will get a conversation started.
Or a topic on the peripheral, censorship, cancers, metabolic disease, name your poison.
Where they show competency of understanding the changing narratives and corruption.
And then there are those who wear masks.
But you can't save them all.
another wonderful poetic commentary, which I very much appreciate and am grateful for. Thank you.
Most won't do anything until it's on TV or Stuff/NZ Herald. Yes they hav their suspicions but want them confirmed by the same sources that fooled them in the first place. Safety in numbers. Numbers they aligned with and know well.
That is the true definition of a vicious circle!
Exactly. I think the best way is to lead by example. When I say that I mean just be happy, positive and healthy, as well as uninjected of course. That in itself speaks volumes and sows a seed on fertile ground for questions to be asked. That may, like ripples in a pond, spread ever outwards.
I feel it's always better to show and be asked than bludgeon people with our own sense of 'being right'. Nobody likes that in their face, do they.
Nice writing NZDoc, thanks.
As an Ausdoc, I completely agree.
The degree and intensity of buy-in to the narrative within the medical profession has to be seen to be believed, never mind the general public and the ‘intelligentsia’.
thank you ... yes, the buy in among the medicos is really beyond belief.
Thanks very much for that, well said, and very much appreciated.
Some quotes I've collected that explain the craziness of the situation...
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )
------
"The evolutionary psychologist William von Hippel found that humans use large parts of thinking power to navigate social world rather than perform independent analysis and decision making. For most people it is the mechanism that, in case of doubt, will prevent one from thinking what is right if, in return, it endangers one’s social status. This phenomenon occurs more strongly the higher a person’s social status. Another factor is that the more educated and more theoretically intelligent a person is, the more their brain is adept at selling them the biggest nonsense as a reasonable idea, as long as it elevates their social status. The upper educated class tends to be more inclined than ordinary people to chase some intellectual boondoggle. "
-Sasha Latypova
a wonderful collection of quotes, thank you so very much!
"I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face."
Yes. And I think it was done for that precise purpose too. Because no modern westerner will get down on their knees and beg for divine forgiveness/guidance/succour etc. unless they are staring death in the face. (Passionate christians notwithstanding.)
There's a relatively recent child's film called 'Puss'n'Boots, the Last Wish'.
Death (played by Fenrir?) stalks the cat with nine lives, and the cat runs, begs, hides etc. until he finally faces death like a real man.
(9 is the number of consciousness.)
There are a million ways to kill vast swathes of humanity outright. Flick of a switch, but this is so much more than that. An exemplary operation down to names, codes, everything has meaning right across the board, even the recent Titan sub.,- it's dazzling if one can get past the terrestrial horrors.
I'd finish the next two parts of a three part description of what I'm trying to say on my own jolly page if I can ever stop commenting on other peoples Substacks...
And about this name, 'Sub stack.' What does one stack? One FILES papers. One stacks logs. For the fire? I was wondering if we are laying the base layer of wood for the inferno of consciousness/truth which might occur when the masses finally click maybe soon, but no later than 2030/2031.
There's a neat couple of lines, the first and last two from a poem by Emily Dickinson which goes;
'Tell all the truth but tell it slant
Success in circuit lies-
The truth must dazzle gradually
Or every man be blind.'
and the emily dickison quote is one of my favorites! Thank you for your commentary.
I refuse to give up hope, and I share your idea that telling everyone about more deaths has no positive effect. If I could find good information about counteracting the bad effects of the jabs, i would share that. I am reading as much as i can about detox. I have shared some of that information.
Simmering OG citrus rinds on low heat for 20 min., drinking that when cooled; as good as any pill of vit C or if pills not available. Also, Burdock root tea daily (add milk and honey if you like) got me through a 'mystery' illness I had way back in Nov. of 2019. Burdock has among many other things, quercitin and inulin, which keeps your blood sugar up if you cannot eat. That happens as the mystery illness was very wasting, just like radiation poisoning can be.
In 2007 I ran against Gavin for mayor of SF killafornia. I lost my business and went to jail, thank you ScKamala.
I said folks ought to be able to live in commercial spaces. 2007.
Now we have literally people sleeping on the sidewalk or worse everywhere in SF or pushed out, and the commercial vacancies are possibly fifty percent, because COVID, democracy, and greed.
But I gave up long ago saying it ought to be legal to live in commercial...
I am struggling to work and live day by day, and like the initial protests against the Harmacide scamdemic injextions and mask mandates and lockdown, all that went away, as well as my will to stay in this shitty, which destroys itself apace.
You have been a hero and, unfortunately like most real heroes, you have paid for it. I send my very best wishes. I remember SF as a lovely humming city not so very long ago ... and now?
Hang in there, my good thoughts and wishes are with you.
Thanks Emanuel.
I've largely given up on trying to convinced the jabbed of their folly in taking an experimental mrna substance into their bodies which may lead to horrific long term illnesses, gross disabilities and ghastly premature deaths. I accept that their pride makes them defensive, sometimes violently so.
Also that the thought of these utterly humungous potential dark and deadly consequences are simply too much for them to contemplate. I suspect many of them in the quiet, private, small hours of the night, and in their dreamings get glimpses of thus reality and subconsciously diversionary themselves in shopping, drinking, mindless media and myriad other distractions.
Of course this produces a psychically numbing. A kind of living torpor. Such is the price of living in massive denial.
As a former psychotherapist I know I could point our their gestalt, at leasr bit by bit and working hard to break through layers if defensiveness, with a few at least but choose not to.
So, I go about my days consciously being as warm, friendly and open as social circumstances allow. The air I'm trying to exude in doing so is one of great health, vitality and confidence. In a word charisma of a sort, and when the previous moment arrives, like you, courageously in the Malaysian eatery, I do my best to become a one man nudge Unit.
I find it's hard emotional and spiritual work as I simultaneously accept that my darkest imaginings about the terrible possible outcomes for many of these poor lost folks may actually come to pass. It's a strange, new place for me to be in psychologically, and yet like anything practiced regularly is gradually strengthening. I wish life weren't so, but there it is. Soldiering on.
*precious moment
Thank you very much for your observations on this terrible mess and its emotional toil on you and other sensible dedicated people. Sadly enough, the darkest imaginings are being realised .... Hang in there!
Thanks for this. I observe this also, that trying to talk to friends, family, and colleagues doesn't help, they only dig in deeper, and it generates a rift. At the same time, I have transcribed many testimonies from the jab injured and it really strikes me, every time, how many of them were enthusiastic about getting jabbed, but once injured, gaslighted, and sometimes even shamed, they did a 180, and fast.
Here's an example of that:
*******************
Suzanna Newell: "My Whole Life Changed in 30 Hours"
"My case isn't unique. There are tens of thousands of us."
https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/41054.html
*******************
This is not so for all of the testimonies I have transcribed. Some didn't want the jab, but they played Russian roulette to keep a job, go to school, or be able to see family members, and now they haven't changed their minds, they're just more angry now.
*******************
Fabien Stocco, Pericarditis by Pfizer: "I'm freaking pissed right now"
"I didn't want to get this vaccine...And now I have pericarditis and I'm not able to go do my job."
https://transcriberb.dreamwidth.org/60979.html
*******************
But again, I observe that under some conditions, some people do change their minds wholly, and very fast. I think the RFK campaign is betting on that-- I actually think, if RFK can achieve a tipping point, he can take the Democratic Party. I'm watching with great interest.
Relatedly, what's also very peculiar to me is that of the covidians I know (multi-jabbed, all in with punishing the unvaxxed), if you'd asked them in 2019 what they thought about segregating people, and mandating experimental gene therapy, vaccines so called, on people at little to no risk of dying of a disease, they would have been horrified, and said, of course, never. So from 2019 to 2021, many minds did a 180 on many things.
you are doing immensely important work for the historical record (predicated upon whether we have a future of course ....). I think RFK Jr will awaken many but he won't be allowed to get the DNC nomination. Thank you for your excellent commentary.
Thanks for your kind words. Same back atcha, for what you are doing with your interviews and more.
All I know is, the future is a strange place, although it may have a lot in common with the present.
It is interesting that the public response has led me to the same approach that you have taken. I'll talk with someone who is interested, but I will no longer argue against a mass delusion.
As part of copywriting, I had to understand persuasion theory. As almost everyone knows, persuasion theory, at its most fundamental level, tells the "seller" of an idea to understand a person's objections and then overcome them. I've never liked that approach because the person who is the subject of persuasion can instinctively detect that the "convincer" is somehow dependent on the decision that will be made and that sets up a power dynamic that I don't like very much. Sadly, the same happens even when I argue, not for personal gain, but because I care about the person to whom I am speaking. They think (and have often told me) that I must need them for validation of my own ideas, or they suppose that I gain some reward if I am able to change their mind. I think the vaxxers sense that anti-vaxxers are trying to build public momentum, which means we need them. But I don't need them. I care about them, but the outcomes in my life are not tied to the decisions they make. So when people impute false, selfish motives to me, I stop.
When I feel compelled to advance an idea, I prefer the approach of a rather unique individual who disregarded traditional persuasion theory and said the better thing to do is to state the truth in a rather deadpan manner and say - here it is, if you want it fine, if not, I don't care. That pulls the plug on the one-upmanship that characterizes those who take the majority, publicly supported, but incorrect position on any topic. I have also noticed that once I say I don't care what they do, it actually increases the credibility of what I say. That doesn't change their response, but it gets rid of the annoying nose-in-the-air effect.
I start out with concern for others, but there is a limit. They have free will, and the right to exercise it, and I am not going to get drawn into the tragedy of their world, where I have no influence or control of outcomes.
Where I have genuine difficulty is in speaking with someone who has been harmed, or potentially harmed by the vaccines, and could be helped, but would have to understand that the spike might be behind their injury. In this instance, the offer of help is intertwined with the pain of knowing the cause, and I feel an obligation to say something, because their health is at stake. It is a similar situation with those who have been vaccinated a few times and are considering what to do now. I'll admit, I lie. I tell them it's like a parabola, and that even if they got a benefit from the first few shots, the benefit can wear off and you would need more and more and more - like heroine. This is the only way I have found to avoid inflicting the pain of the truth of the shots they took, while trying to help them make the right decision about futures shots. It is an imperfect world. I have an imperfect solution. What do you do when part of the truth is "you have caused pain for yourself." I can't bring myself to do that to others when I cannot eliminate all the ill consequences for them, even under the best of circumstances.
Thank you so much for your very rich commentary and taking the time to share this with us. We are in a very challenging position ... recently a relative of a relative had a heart attack at the age of 39. No questioning of the possible catalysis by the jab (he's had at least four by the way.
I'm in UK, was a "normie" until Aug/Sept 2020 when I accidentally discovered the PCR "test" was based on computer sequences, not the actual alleged virus and noticed how more testing produced more "cases" rather than more ill people. I also discovered all the alternative video platforms, certain websites and, of course, substack. I tried to warn friends and family of the distasters of previous attempts using mRNA in animal subjects also. Alas, I failed to prevent anyone to get them. Most just wanted their lives back, to work, socialise, travel, some frightened so much because of their normal bad health who now have had 5 or even 6 of these bioweapons! What most medical people look at is just the medical side but I think if the lockdowns, masking, social distancing along with how doctors were prevented from treating patients in the normal way, they should see how politicised this was globally and more to do with another banking crises and funnelling of money to support these banks, yet again. Now we have moved to a war and energy crises and the big push on global warming. The WHO and UN are globalist predators with their IHR, Pandemic Treaty and zero CO2 goals. I think unless people move away from listening only to mainstream news and reading the mainstream papers, they will remain hoodwinked.
I think you are absolutely correct... you have described a clear-thinking trajectory of discovery and the dots all connect. Thank you so much for sharing this.
Thanks for your insights and to all those who have made the effort to enlighten those that knew something did not add up as we did not have the understanding and information to support our gut feelings. This has been a time of great learning and a reevaluation of everything we thought we knew. Interacting with close family and friends who are proud and virtuous about their collection of boosters is not a joy but a shrinking of our heart as any effort to nudge or explain is a thankless pointless task for now. To be enriched by so much knowledge and insights can never be uplifting when the majority wallow in their received ignorance, they are the anchor that prevents humanity advancing to where we must reach.
Time and small steps for now; the churning will have a result, let’s hope for humanity it is not the dark ages but a new age. For now to inform ourselves seems the only option, to be creative the spark that is missing in this joyless trance they are keeping the majority addicted too.
You put it so very well ... we are challenged immensely by ignorance around us, by familial rifts, etc. Thank you so much for taking the time to comment and share your observations.
When I went through my 'cogdis' about this, I went literally crazy for about a day. It was when they threatened, and then really started, to jab the little ones. So as the few of the jabbed wake to this genocide, I fully expect them to also go crazy, at least momentarily. It represents an upending of our core trust in others as fellow humans, and it should not be an easy realization. Also, re your words, 'They bought the materialist ideal, they’ve flaunted their numbers in the complex rat race they’ve accepted, and they’ve got nothing to look forward to except more money, more stuff and more life, even if that life is increasingly hemmed in by their authorities.', I have to add that many of them are now dead, from the jabs, and it doesn't get more hemmed in than that. The walking dead, decades of untimely funerals to attend. I do what I can to stay sane, thank you for the assistance Dr. G.
No worries Doc, you're a decent man & your commentary is historically important.
G'day NZD, I used to try & have a go at giving a "heads up" to the poor dudded ( deluded )but it appears to me that some, not all, think they've made a smart choice & the other side, i.e. the thinkers, are complete morons ( happy to be one). That's the some, the not all just don't want to know imo, (cue fingers in the ears & la,la,la,) they are a bit like the punter who brags about their winners but NEVER about their loser's or that they may have been sold a pup, or that have been totally duped, therefore they look like an complete & utter dill(s) but in their favour & nearly always on the quiet, they make a sensible decision to NEVER take another dose of the poison. Of course I could be wrong, doubt it.
I don't think you're wrong ... thank you for your reading and commentary, they are much appreciated.
Here is one suggestion that may alter our discourse and understanding. Rather than referring to it as the Main Stream Media (MSM). Perhaps we should refer to it as the Organized Media (OM), with or without capitalization.
It does contain undertones of Organized Jewry, but this is incidental rather than deliberate and may be appropriate in any case.
Edit: The idea of course suggests that this branch of media is organized and not organic and that there is some purpose behind what is published and that it may or may not be factual.
How about Fake News?
I can live with not being able to convince/warn adult friends and family about the lies they're being told by msm(edia) and authorities but when it comes to their children and pets, I get very distressed to see the harm being inflicted by their well meaning but sleepy caregivers.
I agree ... it's very hard. Thank you for taking the time to comment.
I think a firm belief in the government probably points to an inability to sit with cognitive dissonance. It also holds a lack of curiosity, and maybe an idea that truth is a relative concept.
Holding here and now comfort above a need to get to the bottom of things has a dubious reward. Those people will fall victim to side effects. I so want to help, but right, we have to keep cool and mete out the facts to those who show some interest.