Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Everything Voluntary Jack's avatar

Thank you Manny and other Doctors Speaking Out with Science, your courageous integrity in upholding the Hippocratic Oath of Do No Harm was and is exemplary.

The vast majority, as you know, of the NZ Medical Establishment remained Obedient To Authority, took the Hypocrisy Oath, and irresponsibly did harm or allowed it to be done.

And that should be lesson learned from the Covid-1984 Milgram Experiment--or as Stanley Milgram wrote in "Obedience To Authority":

“This is, perhaps, the most fundamental lesson of our study: ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority. A variety of inhibitions against disobeying authority come into play and successfully keep the person in his place. The disappearance of a sense of responsibility is the most far reaching consequence of submission to authority.”

I take it as responsibly free human beings, our task is to increase the numbers of those "relatively few" by supplying them with those "resources needed to resist authority".

Talks like yours are doing just that.

“What is a rebel? A man who says No; but whose refusal does not imply a renunciation. He is also a man who says Yes, from the moment he makes his first gesture of rebellion.” Albert Camus

Rebel, stay free, stay safe.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Re: "...when does anyone have the right to take away our fundamental human rights and our autonomy?"

During Covid mandates, politicians, bureaucrats and others demanded control of people's bodies.

For example, in Australia, in 2021, then Victorian Premier Daniel Andrews said "There is going to be a vaccinated economy, and you get to participate in that if you are vaccinated...We're going to move to a situation where, to protect the health system, we are going to lock out people who are not vaccinated and can be". https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-09-06/daniel-andrews-vaccine-passport-double-vaccinated/100435606

In other words, people were to be denied participation in society if they refused to consent to Covid-19 vaccination.

On what basis did Daniel Andrews impose this tyranny? How could this man deny others the freedom to participate in society if they refused to be injected?

How did the medical 'profession' go along with this?

Think about it... The medical 'profession' collaborated with people being coerced/mandated to submit to medical interventions to participate in life - 'No Jab, No Life'.

Practitioners injected people they knew were under duress to submit to the injections, they violated voluntary informed consent. This means there wasn't valid consent.

People were denied their livelihoods and participation in society if they refused the jabs...IT'S MIND-BLOWING THAT THIS HAPPENED IN SUPPOSED 'FREE' COUNTRIES!!!!

What is it going to mean when the penny drops that there is no valid consent, that practitioners violated voluntary informed consent?

Expand full comment
60 more comments...

No posts