Medical Coercion: The Quintessence of Tyranny

The Hippocratic prohibition not to harm was codified by the famous Greek physician because the potential to do harm, as a physician, was immense.  Consulting a healer, on whom the hopes for treatment and recovery depend, becomes something akin to a sacred act of trust, because a person suffering, a person weakened and perhaps even terrified by illness, is at his or her most vulnerable. The physician therefore becomes a wielder of immense power over the supplicating patient. The laying on of hands during a doctor’s physical examination is an activity fraught with portent, and the allowances granted to a physician into the hidden recesses of the labyrinths of mind and body are unique and extraordinary.

As a result of this disparity in power, and the belief and trust in the expertise of the healing authority, a physician’s recommendations to a patient carry extraordinarily persuasive weight.

With the introduction of COVID onto the world stage, something uncanny and remarkable occurred. Aside from the global lockdowns – a term, incidentally, I had only associated with prison emergencies – and the commands to distance and wear masks, all of which had no basis in any reputable science, I was impressed most deeply by two things:

1)  the absence of any vigorous attempt to treat patients unless they had reached a point of crisis and required hospitalisation, and

2) the universal push to use a so-called vaccine that had been developed hastily and was by definition experimental

Those doctors who attempted, as doctors should, to emphasize informed consent, and who were reluctant to recommend a novel agent universally in a kind of one-size-fits-all approach advocated by public health officials, soon found themselves under investigation by regulatory agencies.  Here  in New Zealand physicians who spoke out on behalf of basic medical principles, and who did as doctors should do by advocating early treatment and prevention, and who refrained from assuming that warp-speed ‘vaccines’ would miraculously have no adverse effects – these doctors have been harassed and persecuted by the Medical Council of New Zealand.

Other doctors – a very vast majority –  did as they were told by the government.

It is one thing for warlords and ruling cabals and governmental cliques and ministries to exert powers of tyranny. For example, during the Peloponnesian Wars the democratic city-state of Athens approached the inhabitants of Melos, an island that sought to be neutral. Athens demanded that the Melians submit to their rule upon pain of conquest, and the Athenians justified their demands by reference to a brutal law of power: the strong do what they can and the weak must accept it. In the end the Melians resisted and Athens subjugated the island, killing the men and enslaving the women and children.

The history of the world is replete with many such examples of the sheer use of authoritative force. But it is another thing for physicians to allow such tyranny into their sacrosanct spaces.

The COVID era has done nothing if not lay bare the exploitation by the State of this doctor-patient relationship, in the service of an agenda that has, at bottom, nothing to do with health, and everything to do with control and, indeed, as we are seeing with the COVID inoculations, actual elimination of the population the State purports to protect.

The New Zealand government has successfully tyrannized its people with a dangerous, destructive and callous policy of mass inoculation. It continues to mandate up-to-date jabs for all healthcare practitioners*, despite a crumbling healthcare system with endemic workforce shortages, and despite a Bill of Rights that stipulates “the right to refuse to undergo medical treatment.” It ensures compliance by making it virtually impossible to obtain either a medical or religious exemption, as I know firsthand.

The government would not be succeeding, however, without an army of physicians who function as willing executioners of medical coercion, which, given its most fundamental violations of body and soul, becomes the quintessence of tyranny.

Emanuel E. Garcia, M.D.

*since the time I first published this the New Zealand government has lifted the inoculation mandate; however, the health system that employs physicians is still requiring doctors and other health practitioners to be jabbed. Two of my colleagues who were terminated by their District Health Boards for not having been jabbed are unable to regain their positions. Another colleague, who has had ‘only’ two jabs, was invited back by her District Health Board to assume her former role after having received a letter of termination while on vacation. As I understand it the new health authority, despite the new position about jab mandates, is only hiring those who have been jabbed, because “Some employers may still require workers to be vaccinated due to health and safety.” It goes without saying that since the jabs prevent neither infection nor transmission, there is no logical basis to assume any benefit to health or safety from the jabbed.

(This is a slightly revised version of an article originally published by Global Research. I chose to resuscitate it in the wake of the release of a film based on RFK Jr’s book on Anthony Fauci.)